Does the maxim "once a Caesarean, always a Caesarean" still hold true?
- PMID: 16173837
- PMCID: PMC1236800
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020305
Does the maxim "once a Caesarean, always a Caesarean" still hold true?
Abstract
Ugwumadu discusses a new tool, reported in PLoS Medicine, that can help to predict the risks of Caesarean section and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after prior Caesarean section.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment on
-
Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section.PLoS Med. 2005 Sep;2(9):e252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020252. Epub 2005 Sep 13. PLoS Med. 2005. PMID: 16146414 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J. 1916;104:1–3.
-
- RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel caesarean section audit report. 2001 Available: http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/nscs_audit.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2005.
-
- Notzon FC, Cnattingius S, Bergsjo P, Cole S, Taffel S, et al. Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: International comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:495–504. - PubMed
-
- Gomes UA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: A comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978–1979 and 1994. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:687–694. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–437. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
