Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1279-96.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00432.x.

Medicare beneficiaries and the impact of gaining prescription drug coverage on inpatient and physician spending

Affiliations

Medicare beneficiaries and the impact of gaining prescription drug coverage on inpatient and physician spending

Becky A Briesacher et al. Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether gaining prescription drug coverage produces cost offsets in Medicare spending on inpatient and physician services.

Data source: Two-year panels constructed from 1995 to 2000 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, a dataset of Medicare claims and health care surveys from the Medicare population.

Study design: We estimated a series of fixed-effects panel models to calculate adjusted changes in Medicare spending as drug coverage was acquired (Gainers) relative to the spending of beneficiaries who never had drug coverage (Nevers). Explanatory variables in the model include age, calendar year, income, and health status.

Principal findings: Assessments of inpatient and physician services spending provided no evidence of overt selection behavior prior to the acquisition of drug coverage (i.e., there were no preswitch spikes in Medicare spending for Gainers). After enrollment, the medical spending of Gainers resembled those of beneficiaries who never had drug coverage. Overall, the multivariate models showed no systematic postenrollment changes in either inpatient or physician spending that could be attributed to the acquisition of drug coverage.

Conclusions: We found no consistent evidence that drug coverage either increases or reduces spending for hospital and physician services. This does not necessarily mean that drug therapy does not substitute for or complement other medical treatments, but rather that neither effect predominates across the Medicare population as a whole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted* Average Changes in Inpatient Spending before and after Drug Coverage Switch for Gainers versus Nevers
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted* Changes in Average Physician/Supplier Spending before and after Drug Coverage Switch for Gainers versus Nevers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atherly A. “The Effect of Medicare Supplemental Insurance on Medicare Expenditures.”. International Journal of Health Care and Finance Economics. 2002;2(2):137–62. - PubMed
    1. Briesacher B, Stuart B, Shea D. “Drug Coverage for Medicare Beneficiaries: Why Protection May Be in Jeopardy.”. Issue Brief (Commonwealth Fund) 2002;(505):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Burstin HR, Swartz K, O'Neil AC, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. “The Effect of Change of Health Insurance on Access to Care.”. Inquiry. 1998;35(4):389–97. - PubMed
    1. Cunningham PJ, Kohn L. “Health Plan Switching: Choice or Circumstance?”. Health Affairs. 2000;19(3):158–64. - PubMed
    1. Gianfrancesco FD, Baines AP, Richards D. “Utilization Effects of Prescription Drug Benefits in an Aging Population.”. Health Care Financing Review. 1994;15(3):113. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms