Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series
- PMID: 16175324
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0143-4
Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series
Abstract
Purpose: Functional outcomes in laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have been incompletely studied. More than one-year follow-up has rarely been reported in these patients. This study was designed to assess operative, functional, and quality of life outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis a minimum of one year after.
Methods: Thirty-three laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 33 open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients, with a median of 13 months and minimum of 12 months follow-up, were identified from a prospective, laparoscopic database. Functional outcome was prospectively assessed by using a standardized survey. These cohorts were matched by individual patient for year of surgery, age, gender, body mass index, and indication.
Results: Median age was 27 years (open) and 28 years (laparoscopic). There were 27 females and 6 males in each group. All operations occurred between 1999 and 2001. Median body mass index was 22.3 (open) and 21.7 (laparoscopic) groups. There were no significant differences in diagnosis, use of diversion, and anastomotic technique. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 6 percent of the laparoscopic cases and 12 percent of the open cases. Functional outcome after a minimum of one year revealed equivalent median day and median nocturnal number of stools of six to seven and one to two respectively. Consistency of stool, medication usage, and continence were no different between groups. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence was similar. Quality of life in regard to social, home life, family, travel, sports, recreation, and sex life were equivalent.
Conclusions: The function and quality of life outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis seem to be equivalent to our open experience. Laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis offers selected patients a safe, feasible, and durable alternative.
Similar articles
-
Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Apr;51(4):392-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9180-5. Epub 2008 Jan 24. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18213489
-
Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-matched study.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):549-53. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9250-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18317838
-
Laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Oct;17(5):388-91. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180de4df3. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007. PMID: 18049398
-
[Technique and results of the ileoanal pouch after proctocolectomy].Zentralbl Chir. 1994;119(12):867-77. Zentralbl Chir. 1994. PMID: 7846969 Review. German.
-
Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis.Br J Surg. 2006 Apr;93(4):407-17. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5276. Br J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16511903 Review.
Cited by
-
Routine placement of abdominal drainage in pouch surgery does not impact on surgical outcomes.Updates Surg. 2023 Apr;75(3):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01411-5. Epub 2022 Dec 7. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36479676 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of Elective Laparoscopic 2-Stage Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis in Korea.Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;36(1):3-4. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.05. Epub 2020 Feb 29. Ann Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32146781 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010 Feb;23(1):42-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247857. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010. PMID: 21286290 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and outcome of anemia after restorative proctocolectomy: a clinical literature review.Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):726-39. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ed571. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009. PMID: 19404082 Free PMC article.
-
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 17704883
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical