Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;55(518):684-9.

Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs

Birgit Aabom  1 , Jakob Kragstrup, Hindrik Vondeling, Leiv S Bakketeig, Henrik Støvring
Affiliations

Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs

Birgit Aabom et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Background: A majority of patients with cancer who are seriously ill have a preference of dying at home. However, only a minority of patients actually die at home in most Western countries.

Aim: To explore factors associated with place of death in an unselected population of patients with cancer.

Design of study: Case-control study.

Setting: County of Funen, Denmark.

Method: Register linkage from six Danish healthcare registers.

Results: The GP's home visit during the last 3 months before death was inversely associated with dying in hospital (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06 to 0.12) and so were community nurses visiting the home (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.48). Furthermore, being married (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.85), and age at death of 40-65 years (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.90) seemed to have an effect. Hospital death was associated with survival time of less than 1 month (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.69 to 3.13). Type of cancer, sex, or residence (urban versus rural) were not associated with a hospital death in this multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Dying at home was, to a higher extent, associated with GP visit and, to a lesser extent, community nurse visit than with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with cancer. In our view, these findings indicate the importance of the GP in particular. To increase the opportunity to die at home, more research is needed on the role of the GP and the interface between GPs and other providers of health care at home for patients who are terminally ill with cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Place of death and change of residence during the last 3 months of life for patients with cancer (n = 4386).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Townsend J, Frank AO, Fermont D, et al. Terminal cancer care and patients preference for place of death: a prospective study. BMJ. 1990;301:415–417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higginson IJ, Sen-Gupta GJ. Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med. 2000;3(3):287–300. - PubMed
    1. Tiernan E, O'Connor M, O'Siorain L, Kearney M. A prospective study of preferred versus actual place of death among patients referred to a palliative care home-care service. Ir Med J. 2002;95(8):232–235. - PubMed
    1. Higginson I, Astin P, Dolan S. Where do patients with cancer die? Ten-year trends in the place of death of patients with cancer in England. Palliat Med. 1998;12(5):353–363. - PubMed
    1. Weitzen S, Teno JM, Fennell M, Mor V. Factors associated with site of death: a national study of where people die. Med Care. 2003;41(2):323–335. - PubMed

Publication types