Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2005 Sep;55(518):696-703.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new nurse-led continence service: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new nurse-led continence service: a randomised controlled trial

Kate S Williams et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Continence services in the UK have developed at different rates within differing care models, resulting in scattered and inconsistent services. Consequently, questions remain about the most cost-effective method of delivering these services.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of a new service led by a continence nurse practitioner compared with existing primary/secondary care provision for people with urinary incontinence and storage symptoms.

Design of study: Randomised controlled trial with a 3- and 6-month follow-up in men and women (n = 3746) aged 40 years and over living in private households (intervention [n = 2958]; control [n = 788]).

Setting: Leicestershire and Rutland, UK.

Method: The continence nurse practitioner intervention comprised a continence service provided by specially trained nurses delivering evidence-based interventions using predetermined care pathways. They delivered an 8-week primary intervention package that included advice on diet and fluids; bladder training; pelvic floor awareness and lifestyle advice. The standard care arm comprised access to existing primary care including GP and continence advisory services in the area. Outcome measures were recorded at 3 and 6 months post-randomisation.

Results: The percentage of individuals who improved (with at least one symptom alleviated) at 3 months was 59% in the intervention group compared with 48% in the standard care group (difference of 11%, 95% CI = 7 to 16; P<0.001) The percentage of people reporting no symptoms or 'cured' was 25% in the intervention group and 15% in the standard care group (difference of 10%, 95% CI = 6 to 13, P = 0.001). At 6 months the difference was maintained. There was a significant difference in impact scores between the two groups at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusions: The continence nurse practitioner-led intervention reduced the symptoms of incontinence, frequency, urgency and nocturia at 3 and 6 months; impact was reduced; and satisfaction with the new service was high.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progress of participants through trail.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of symptoms alleviated at 3 months compared to baseline, presented by randomisation group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of symptoms alleviated at 6 months compared to baseline, presented by randomisation group.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Milne JL, Moore KN. An exploratory study of continence care services worldwide. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40:235–247. - PubMed
    1. The Royal College of Physicians. Incontinence. Causes, management and provision of services. A Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995;29:272–274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Department of Health. The new NHS: modern, dependable. London: The Stationary Office; 1997.
    1. Roe B, Wilson K, Doll H, Brooks P. An evaluation of health interventions by primary health care teams and continence advisory services on patient outcomes related to incontinence: volume 1, main report. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit of the University of Oxford; 1996.
    1. Shields N, Thomas C, Benson K, et al. Development of a community nurse-led continence service. Br J Nurs. 1998;7(14):824–830. - PubMed

Publication types