Validity of measures is no simple matter
- PMID: 16178997
- PMCID: PMC1361215
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00443.x
Validity of measures is no simple matter
Abstract
Purpose and method: This article aims to promote a better understanding of the nature of measurement, the special problems posed by measurement in the social sciences, and the inevitable limitations on inferences in science (so that results are not overinterpreted), by using the measurement of blood pressure as an example. As it is necessary to raise questions about the meaning and extent of the validity of something as common as measured blood pressure, even more serious questions are unavoidable in relation to other commonly used measures in social science. The central issue is the validity of the inferences about the construct rather than the validity of the measure per se.
Conclusion: It is important to consider the definition and validity of the construct at issue as well as the adequacy of its representation in the measurement instrument. By considering a particular construct within the context of a conceptual model, researchers and clinicians will improve their understanding of the construct's validity as measured.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings.Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 2):1605-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00445.x. Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 16178998 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring subjective outcomes: rethinking reliability and validity.J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Nov;13(11):757-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00228.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1998. PMID: 9824522 Free PMC article.
-
Use of standardized measures in agency based research and practice.Soc Work Health Care. 2001;34(1-2):115-29. doi: 10.1300/j010v34n01_09. Soc Work Health Care. 2001. PMID: 12219762 Review.
-
Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions.Addiction. 2000 Nov;95 Suppl 3:S347-60. doi: 10.1080/09652140020004278. Addiction. 2000. PMID: 11132362 Review.
-
Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations.Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 2):1676-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00447.x. Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 16179002 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Measuring what matters in healthcare: a practical guide to psychometric principles and instrument development.Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1225850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225850. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37790221 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Training Load as Exposure and Dose.Sports Med. 2023 Sep;53(9):1667-1679. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01833-0. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37022589 Free PMC article.
-
The risk-value trade-off: price and brand information impact consumers' intentions to purchase OTC drugs.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 25;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00293-5. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021. PMID: 33487179 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring fitness in female gymnasts: the gymnastics functional measurement tool.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):124-38. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012. PMID: 22530187 Free PMC article.
-
Word Recall: Cognitive Performance Within Internet Surveys.JMIR Ment Health. 2015 Jun 2;2(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/mental.3969. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun. JMIR Ment Health. 2015. PMID: 26543924 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aiken LS, West SG, Sechrest L, Reno RR. “Graduate Training in Statistics, Methodology, and Measurement in Psychology.”. American Psychologist. 1990;45(6):721–34. - PubMed
-
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, NCME) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
-
- Baccellis G, Reggiani P, Mattioli A, Corbellini E, Garducci S, Catalano M, Omboni S. “Hemodynamic Changes in the Lower Limbs during Treadmill Walking in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Arteriosclerosis Obliterans.”. Angiology. 1997;48(9):795–803. - PubMed
-
- Beck AT, Ward CH, Mock J, Erbaugh J. “An Inventory for Measuring Depression.”. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71. - PubMed
-
- Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J. “The Concept of Validity.”. Psychological Review. 2004;111:1061–71. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials