Pharmacodynamic study of procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler: evaluation of pharmacodynamic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler in asthma patients in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner
- PMID: 16179955
- DOI: 10.1358/mf.2005.27.6.896830
Pharmacodynamic study of procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler: evaluation of pharmacodynamic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler in asthma patients in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner
Abstract
Therapeutic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler (Meptin DPI) and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler (Meptin MDI), the currently marketed formulation, was assessed in 16 patients with bronchial asthma. The study was conducted in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner, using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) as an index of bronchodilatory effect. In Period I, the patients received 20 mcg of either Meptin DPI or Meptin MDI, and then crossed over in Period II after a washout interval of 3--28 days. Pharmacodynamic equivalence was accessed using AUC (FEV1)/h and peak FEV1 as indices, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors used for the analysis were the treatment group and/or carryover effect, patients within each group, period, and treatment. The 90% confidence intervals for the differences between the two treatments were --0.0995 to --0.0204 (L) for mean AUC (FEV1)/h and --0.102 to --0.022 (L) for mean peak FEV1, both within the acceptance criteria of --0.15 to 0.15 (L). Meptin DPI was therefore assessed as being equivalent to the current Meptin MDI.
(c) 2005 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study.Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018 May;7(4):392-399. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.379. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018. PMID: 28884969 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacodynamic equivalence study of CFC-free and CFC-containing procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhalers.Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;27(8):555-8. doi: 10.1358/mf.2005.27.8.928309. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2005. PMID: 16273135 Clinical Trial.
-
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17692718 Clinical Trial.
-
Could interchangeable use of dry powder inhalers affect patients?Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005 Dec;(149):3-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-504X.2005.00720.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16279996 Review.
-
Can patients use all dry powder inhalers equally well?Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005 Dec;(149):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-504X.2005.00722.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005. PMID: 16279998 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study.Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018 May;7(4):392-399. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.379. Epub 2017 Sep 8. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018. PMID: 28884969 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical