Sex, stress, and fear: individual differences in conditioned learning
- PMID: 16180625
- DOI: 10.3758/cabn.5.2.191
Sex, stress, and fear: individual differences in conditioned learning
Abstract
It has long been recognized that humans vary in their conditionability, yet the factors that contribute to individual variation in emotional learning remain to be delineated. The goal of the present study was to investigate the relationship among sex, stress hormones, and fear conditioning in humans. Forty-five healthy adults (22 females) underwent differential delay conditioning, using fear-relevant conditioned stimuli and a shock unconditioned stimulus. Salivary cortisol samples were taken at baseline and after acquisition training and a 24-h-delayed retention test. The results showed that acquisition of conditioning significantly correlated with postacquisition cortisol levels in males, but not in females. This sex-specific relationship was found despite similar overall levels of conditioning, unconditioned responding, and cortisol. There was no effect of postacquisition cortisol on consolidation of fear learning in either sex. These findings have implications for the understanding of individual differences in fear acquisition and risk factors for the development of affective disorders.
Similar articles
-
Investigating the impact of sex and cortisol on implicit fear conditioning with fMRI.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Jan;35(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.07.009. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010. PMID: 19683399 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of stress and sex on acquisition and consolidation of human fear conditioning.Learn Mem. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(4):441-50. doi: 10.1101/lm.189106. Epub 2006 Jul 17. Learn Mem. 2006. PMID: 16847304 Free PMC article.
-
Stress differentially affects fear conditioning in men and women.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Nov;38(11):2529-41. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013. PMID: 23790683
-
Amygdala, long-term potentiation, and fear conditioning.Neuroscientist. 2005 Feb;11(1):75-88. doi: 10.1177/1073858404270857. Neuroscientist. 2005. PMID: 15632280 Review.
-
Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning.Physiol Behav. 2009 May 25;97(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.035. Epub 2009 Mar 9. Physiol Behav. 2009. PMID: 19272397 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
From resilience to vulnerability: mechanistic insights into the effects of stress on transitions in critical period plasticity.Front Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 13;4:90. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00090. eCollection 2013. Front Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 23964249 Free PMC article.
-
Differential effects of acute stress on anticipatory and consummatory phases of reward processing.Neuroscience. 2014 Apr 25;266:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.058. Epub 2014 Feb 7. Neuroscience. 2014. PMID: 24508744 Free PMC article.
-
Critical brain circuits at the intersection between stress and learning.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jul;34(8):1223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010. PMID: 20153364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of gonadal hormones on conditioned fear extinction in healthy humans.Neuroscience. 2010 Jul 14;168(3):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 Apr 22. Neuroscience. 2010. PMID: 20412837 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in heart rate responses to script-driven imagery soon after trauma and risk of posttraumatic stress disorder.Psychosom Med. 2010 Nov;72(9):917-24. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181f8894b. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Psychosom Med. 2010. PMID: 20947782 Free PMC article.