Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations
- PMID: 16183798
- PMCID: PMC2564536
- DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.036913
Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations
Abstract
Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by severe mental retardation, dysmorphic features, ataxia, seizures, and typical behavioural characteristics, including a happy sociable disposition. AS is caused by maternal deficiency of UBE3A (E6 associated protein ubiquitin protein ligase 3A gene), located in an imprinted region on chromosome 15q11-q13. Although there are four different molecular types of AS, deletions of the 15q11-q13 region account for approximately 70% of the AS patients. These deletions are usually detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation studies. The deletions can also be subclassified based on their size into class I and class II, with the former being larger and encompassing the latter.
Methods: We studied 22 patients with AS due to microdeletions using a microarray based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) assay to define the deletions and analysed their phenotypic severity, especially expression of the autism phenotype, in order to establish clinical correlations.
Results: Overall, children with larger, class I deletions were significantly more likely to meet criteria for autism, had lower cognitive scores, and lower expressive language scores compared with children with smaller, class II deletions. Children with class I deletions also required more medications to control their seizures than did those in the class II group.
Conclusions: There are four known genes (NIPA1, NIPA2, CYFIP1, & GCP5) that are affected by class I but not class II deletions, thus raising the possibility of a role for these genes in autism as well as the development of expressive language skills.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: there are no competing interests
References
-
- Angelman H. “Puppet children”: a report of three cases. Dev Med Child Neurol 19657681–688. - PubMed
-
- Berg J M, Pakula Z. Angelman's (“happy puppet”) syndrome. Am J Dis Child 197212372–74. - PubMed
-
- Williams C A, Angelman H, Clayton‐Smith J, Driscoll D J, Hendrickson J E, Knoll J H, Magenis R E, Schinzel A, Wagstaff J, Whidden E M, Zori R T. Angelman syndrome: consensus for diagnostic criteria. Angelman Syndrome Foundation. Am J Med Genet 199556237–238. - PubMed
-
- Fryburg J S, Breg W R, Lindgren V. Diagnosis of Angelman syndrome in infants. Am J Med Genet 19913858–64. - PubMed
-
- Magenis R E, Brown M G, Lacy D A, Budden S, LaFranchi S. Is Angelman syndrome an alternate result of del(15)(q11q13)? Am J Med Genet 198728829–838. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases