Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?
- PMID: 16184014
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02703726
Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?
Abstract
Transgenic insecticidal plants based on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxins, on proteinase inhibitors and on lectins, and transgenic herbicide tolerant plants are widely used in modern agriculture. The results of the studies on likelihood and non-likelihood of adverse effects of transgenic plants on the environment including: (i) effects on nontarget species; (ii) invasiveness; (iii) potential for transgenes to 'escape' into the environment by horizontal gene transfer; and (iv) adverse effects on soil biota are reviewed. In general, it seems that large-scale implementation of transgenic insecticidal and herbicide tolerant plants do not display considerable negative effects on the environments and, moreover, at least some transgenic plants can improve the corresponding environments and human health because their production considerably reduces the load of chemical insecticides and herbicides.
Similar articles
-
Herbicide and insect resistant Bt cotton pollen assessment finds no detrimental effects on adult honey bees.Environ Pollut. 2017 Nov;230:479-485. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.094. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Environ Pollut. 2017. PMID: 28688300
-
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.J Environ Biol. 2008 Sep;29(5):641-53. J Environ Biol. 2008. PMID: 19295059 Review.
-
Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:845-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002. PMID: 11729093 Review.
-
Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms.Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:271-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130352. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005. PMID: 15355241 Review.
-
Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7700-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.130202097. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000. PMID: 10840067 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Characterization and fine mapping of a female fertility associated gene Ff1(t) in rice.J Genet. 2015 Mar;94(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s12041-015-0490-4. J Genet. 2015. PMID: 25846878
-
Beyond risk. A more realistic risk-benefit analysis of agricultural biotechnologies.EMBO Rep. 2008 Apr;9(4):302-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.39. EMBO Rep. 2008. PMID: 18379579 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.Microb Ecol. 2011 Apr;61(3):646-59. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9776-5. Epub 2010 Dec 3. Microb Ecol. 2011. PMID: 21128072
-
Do genetically modified plants impact arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?Ecotoxicology. 2010 Feb;19(2):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s10646-009-0423-1. Epub 2009 Oct 6. Ecotoxicology. 2010. PMID: 19806453
-
Resources and Methods for Engineering "Designer" Glycan-Binding Proteins.Molecules. 2021 Jan 13;26(2):380. doi: 10.3390/molecules26020380. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 33450899 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources