Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech
- PMID: 16185840
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.008
Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech
Abstract
Because of the aperiodicity of many tracheoesophageal voices, acoustic analysis of the tracheoesophageal voice is less straightforward than that of the normal voice. This study presents the development and testing of an acoustic signal typing system based on visual inspection of a narrow-band spectrogram that can be used by researchers for classification of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech. In addition to this classification system, a selection of acoustic measures [median fundamental frequency, standard deviation of fundamental frequency, jitter, percentage of voiced (%Voiced), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), glottal-to-noise excitation (GNE) ratio, and band energy difference (BED)] was computed to provide more insight into the acoustic components of tracheoesophageal voice quality. For clinical relevance, relationships between the acoustic signal types and an overall judgment of the voice were investigated as well. Results showed that the four acoustic signal types form a good basis for performing more acoustic analyses and give a good impression of the overall quality of the voice.
Similar articles
-
Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.J Voice. 2012 May;26(3):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Aug 5. J Voice. 2012. PMID: 21820272
-
The Relationship Between Acoustic Signal Typing and Perceptual Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality for Sustained Vowels.J Voice. 2015 Jul;29(4):517.e23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.10.002. Epub 2015 Mar 17. J Voice. 2015. PMID: 25795366
-
Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):819.e7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.05.008. J Voice. 2012. PMID: 23177753
-
Frequency and voice: perspectives in the time domain.J Voice. 2006 Sep;20(3):325-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Apr 19. J Voice. 2006. PMID: 16626935 Review.
-
[Current methods of acoustic analysis of voice: a review].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec;36(12):966-970;976. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.12.016. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 36543409 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Voice quality and surgical detail in post-laryngectomy tracheoesophageal speakers.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep;273(9):2669-79. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3777-4. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26395116
-
Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 May-Jun;75(3):432-40. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30663-7. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 19649496 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationship Between Voice Handicap Index and Voice-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Early Laryngeal Cancer.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):587-593. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03356-y. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37275120 Free PMC article.
-
Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.J Commun Disord. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):235-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 20. J Commun Disord. 2012. PMID: 22305772 Free PMC article.
-
The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation.Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46223-7. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31278355 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources