Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group
- PMID: 1618694
- PMCID: PMC5918857
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1992.tb01945.x
Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group
Abstract
A case-control study to evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening conducted by us showed that lung cancer screening may reduce the mortality of the disease up to 28%. Assuming this efficacy is unbiased, and that the screening rate is 51.6%, which was observed in the control group in the above study, the number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening in the study period was calculated to be 47 for males and females combined. In the same study population, screen-detected lung cancer patients (N = 207) in the same study period were followed and the 7-year survival rate (46.9%) was compared to the 5-year survival rate (11.3%) obtained by the Osaka Cancer Registry, in which screen-detected lung cancer patients were only 1.8%. The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening, estimated by the difference in the above two survival rates, was 74 (95% confidence interval; 55-93). The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening estimated from the case-control study was significantly lower than that estimated from the survival analysis. This indicates that the efficacy of lung cancer screening estimated by the case-control study was within the range that could be explained by the actual long-term survivors among the screen-detected patients in the study population.
Similar articles
-
Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study.Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2356-62. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2356::aid-cncr8>3.3.co;2-q. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 11147612 Clinical Trial.
-
Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment.Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2363-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2363::aid-cncr9>3.3.co;2-n. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 11147613 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for lung cancer re-examined. A reinterpretation of the Mayo Lung Project randomized trial on lung cancer screening.Chest. 1993 Apr;103(4 Suppl):337S-341S. Chest. 1993. PMID: 7802732 Clinical Trial.
-
Chest X-ray screening improves outcome in lung cancer. A reappraisal of randomized trials on lung cancer screening.Chest. 1995 Jun;107(6 Suppl):270S-279S. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.6_supplement.270s. Chest. 1995. PMID: 7781405 Review.
-
Lung cancer screening and its efficacy.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Oct;57(10):519-27. doi: 10.1007/s11748-009-0448-7. Epub 2009 Oct 16. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19830514 Review.
References
-
- ) Fontana , R. S. , Sanderson , D. R. , Woolner , L. B. , Taylor , W. F. , Miller , W. E. , Muhm , J. R. , Bernatz , P. E. , Payne , W. S. , Pairolero , P. C. and Bergstralh , E. J.Screening for lung cancer, a critique of Mayo Lung Project . Cancer , 67 , 1155 – 1164 ( 1991. ). - PubMed
-
- ) Melamed , M. R. and Flehinger , B. J.Detection of lung cancer: highlights of the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Study in New York City . Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. , 117 , 1457 – 1463 ( 1987. ). - PubMed
-
- ) Tockman , M. S.Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population: The Johns Hopkins Study . In , 89 ( suppl. ), 324 – 325 ( 1986. ).
-
- ) Kubik , A. , Parkin , D. M. , Khlat , M. , Erban , J. , Polak , J. and Adamec , M.Lack of benefit from semi‐annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow‐up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high‐risk males in Czechoslovakia . Int. J. Cancer , 45 , 26 – 33 ( 1990. ). - PubMed
-
- ) Prorok , P. C. , Chamberlain , J. , Day , N. E. , Hakama , M. and Miller , A. B.UICC workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer . Int. J. Cancer , 34 , 1 – 4 ( 1984. ). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical