Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1992 May;83(5):424-30.
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1992.tb01945.x.

Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of lung cancer screening; comparison of results from a case-control study and a survival analysis. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group

T Sobue et al. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1992 May.

Abstract

A case-control study to evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening conducted by us showed that lung cancer screening may reduce the mortality of the disease up to 28%. Assuming this efficacy is unbiased, and that the screening rate is 51.6%, which was observed in the control group in the above study, the number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening in the study period was calculated to be 47 for males and females combined. In the same study population, screen-detected lung cancer patients (N = 207) in the same study period were followed and the 7-year survival rate (46.9%) was compared to the 5-year survival rate (11.3%) obtained by the Osaka Cancer Registry, in which screen-detected lung cancer patients were only 1.8%. The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening, estimated by the difference in the above two survival rates, was 74 (95% confidence interval; 55-93). The number of lung cancer deaths prevented by screening estimated from the case-control study was significantly lower than that estimated from the survival analysis. This indicates that the efficacy of lung cancer screening estimated by the case-control study was within the range that could be explained by the actual long-term survivors among the screen-detected patients in the study population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. ) Fontana , R. S. , Sanderson , D. R. , Woolner , L. B. , Taylor , W. F. , Miller , W. E. , Muhm , J. R. , Bernatz , P. E. , Payne , W. S. , Pairolero , P. C. and Bergstralh , E. J.Screening for lung cancer, a critique of Mayo Lung Project . Cancer , 67 , 1155 – 1164 ( 1991. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Melamed , M. R. and Flehinger , B. J.Detection of lung cancer: highlights of the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Study in New York City . Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. , 117 , 1457 – 1463 ( 1987. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Tockman , M. S.Survival and mortality from lung cancer in a screened population: The Johns Hopkins Study . In , 89 ( suppl. ), 324 – 325 ( 1986. ).
    1. ) Kubik , A. , Parkin , D. M. , Khlat , M. , Erban , J. , Polak , J. and Adamec , M.Lack of benefit from semi‐annual screening for cancer of the lung: follow‐up report of a randomized controlled trial on a population of high‐risk males in Czechoslovakia . Int. J. Cancer , 45 , 26 – 33 ( 1990. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Prorok , P. C. , Chamberlain , J. , Day , N. E. , Hakama , M. and Miller , A. B.UICC workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer . Int. J. Cancer , 34 , 1 – 4 ( 1984. ). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources