Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 16189062
- PMCID: PMC1466912
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.349
Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Depression is common in primary care. There are no systematic reviews of depression treatment comparing antidepressants with placebo; hence, we do not know whether these medications are effective in primary care.
Methods: We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group register of controlled trials, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical abstracts, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Abstracts of potential studies were reviewed independently by 2 authors. Studies needed to include randomized controlled trials of either a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), or both, and placebo in a primary care setting. The data and quality of the studies were extracted and assessed by 2 authors blind to the other's choice. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. The main outcome measures were the standardized mean difference and weighted mean difference of the final mean depression scores, the relative risk of improvement, and the number withdrawing because of side effects. Pooling of results was done using Review Manager 4.2.2.
Results: There were 10 studies in which TCAs were compared with placebo, 3 in which SSRIs were compared with placebo, and 2 with both compared with placebo. One half of the studies were of low methodological quality, and nearly all studies were of short duration, typically 6 to 8 weeks. Pooled estimates of efficacy data showed a relative risk of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.12-1.42) for improvement with TCAs compared with placebo; For SSRIs, relative risk was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21-1.55). Most patients, 56% to 60%, responded well to active treatment compared with 42% to 47% for placebo. The number needed to treat for TCAs was about 4, and for SSRIs it was 6. The numbers needed to harm (for withdrawal caused by side effects) ranged from 5 to 11 for TCAs and 21 to 94 for SSRIs. Low-dose (100 mg or 75 mg) as well as high-dose TCAs were effective.
Conclusion: This systematic review is the first comparing antidepressants with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care. Both TCAs and SSRIs are effective. This review is also the first to show that low-dose TCAs are effective in primary care. Prescribing antidepressants in primary care is a more effective clinical activity than prescribing placebo.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.J Affect Disord. 2000 Apr;58(1):19-36. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0. J Affect Disord. 2000. PMID: 10760555
-
SSRIS versus tricyclic antidepressants in depressed inpatients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.Depress Anxiety. 1998;7 Suppl 1:11-7. Depress Anxiety. 1998. PMID: 9597346
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants in young patients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.Clin Ther. 2014 Jul 1;36(7):1087-1095.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Clin Ther. 2014. PMID: 24998011 Review.
-
The treatment of severe depression: is there an efficacy gap between SSRI and TCA antidepressant generations?J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;55 Suppl A:55-9; discussion 60-1, 98-100. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994. PMID: 7961543 Review.
-
Pharmacotherapy for major depression with melancholic features: relative efficacy of tricyclic versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants.J Affect Disord. 1996 Jun 20;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00014-6. J Affect Disord. 1996. PMID: 8835647 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychiatric Neural Networks and Precision Therapeutics by Machine Learning.Biomedicines. 2021 Apr 8;9(4):403. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040403. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 33917863 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of paroxetine-mediated inhibition of GRK2 expression on depression and cardiovascular function in patients with myocardial infarction.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Sep 13;12:2333-2341. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S109880. eCollection 2016. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016. PMID: 27695334 Free PMC article.
-
Acupuncture treatment modulates the corticostriatal reward circuitry in major depressive disorder.J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jan;84:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 16. J Psychiatr Res. 2017. PMID: 27693978 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Antidepressants for treatment of depression in palliative patients : a systematic literature review].Schmerz. 2012 Sep;26(5):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1221-x. Schmerz. 2012. PMID: 22968366 German.
-
Cross-sectional survey of patients in receipt of long-term repeat prescriptions for antidepressant drugs in primary care.Ment Health Fam Med. 2008 Jun;5(2):105-9. Ment Health Fam Med. 2008. PMID: 22477855 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arya R. The management of depression in primary health care. Curr Opin. 1999;12:103–107.
-
- Suh T, Gallo JJ. The management of depression among general medical service providers. Psychol Med. 1999;27:1051–1063. - PubMed
-
- Joffe R, Sokolov S. Antidepressant treatment of depression : a meta-analysis. Can J Psychiatr. 1996;41:613–616. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources