Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Oct;49(10):4035-41.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4035-4041.2005.

Novel, single-dose microsphere formulation of azithromycin versus 7-day levofloxacin therapy for treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired Pneumonia in adults

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Novel, single-dose microsphere formulation of azithromycin versus 7-day levofloxacin therapy for treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired Pneumonia in adults

Joseph D'Ignazio et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study was designed to demonstrate that a single 2.0-g oral dose of a novel microsphere formulation of azithromycin was at least as effective as 7 days of levofloxacin, 500 mg/day, in the treatment of adult patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (Fine classes I, II, and III). In total, 427 subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin microspheres (n = 213) or a 7-day regimen of levofloxacin (n = 214). At baseline, 219 of 423 (51.8%) treated subjects had at least one pathogen identified by culture, PCR, or serology. The primary end point was the clinical response (cure or failure) in the "clinical per protocol" population at test of cure (days 13 to 24). Clinical cure rates were 89.7% (156 of 174) for azithromycin microspheres and 93.7% (177 of 189) for levofloxacin (treatment difference, -4.0%; 95% confidence interval, -9.7%, 1.7%). Bacteriologic success at test of cure in the "bacteriologic per protocol" population was 90.7% (97 of 107) for azithromycin microspheres and 92.3% (120 of 130) for levofloxacin (treatment difference, -1.7%; 95% confidence interval, -8.8%, 5.5%). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated; the incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 19.9% and 12.3% for azithromycin and levofloxacin, respectively. A single 2.0-g dose of azithromycin microspheres was at least as effective as a 7-day course of levofloxacin in the treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babl, F. E., S. I. Pelton, and Z. Li. 2002. Experimental acute otitis media due to non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae: comparison of high and low azithromycin doses with placebo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2194-2199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein, J. M. 1999. Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia—IDSA guidelines. Chest 115:9S—13S. - PubMed
    1. Bradbury, F. 1995. Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 31:153-162. - PubMed
    1. Branthwaite, A., and J.-C. Pechere. 1996. Pan-European survey of patients' attitudes to antibiotics and antibiotic use. J. Int. Med. Res. 24:229-238. - PubMed
    1. Carratalà, J., N. Fernández-Sabé, L. Ortega, X. Castellsagué, B. Rosón, J. Dorca, A. Fernández-Agüera, R. Verdaguer, J. Martinez, F. Manresa, and F. Gudiol. 2005. Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia. Ann. Intern. Med. 142:165-172. - PubMed

MeSH terms