Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise
- PMID: 1619122
- DOI: 10.1121/1.402834
Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise
Abstract
Thresholds of a 5-ms, 1-kHz signal were determined in the presence of a frozen-noise masker. The noise had a flat power spectrum between 20 Hz and 5 kHz and was presented with a duration of 300 ms. The following interaural conditions were tested with four listeners: Noise and signal monaural at the same ear (monaural condition, NmSm), noise and signal identical at both ears (diotic condition, NoSo), noise identical at both ears and signal monaural (dichotic condition, NoSm) and uncorrelated noise at the two ears and signal monaural (NuSm). The signal was presented at a fixed temporal position with respect to the frozen noise in all measurements and thresholds were determined for different starting phases of the carrier frequency of the signal. Variation of the carrier phase strongly influenced the detection in the diotic condition and the masked thresholds varied by more than 10 dB. The pattern of thresholds for the monaural condition was less variable and the thresholds were generally higher than for the diotic condition. The monaural-diotic difference for specific starting phases amounted to as much as 8 dB. Comparison measurements using running noise maskers revealed no such difference. This relation between monaural and diotic thresholds was further investigated with eight additional subjects. Again, monaural and diotic thresholds in running noise were identical, while in frozen noise, diotic thresholds were consistently lower than monaural thresholds, even when the ear with the lower NmSm threshold was compared. For the starting phase showing the largest monaural-diotic difference, the thresholds for NoSm lay between the monaural and the diotic values. At other starting phases, the NoSm threshold was clearly lower than both the NmSm and the NoSo threshold. One possible explanation of the observed monaural-diotic differences relates to contralateral efferent interaction between the right and the left hearing pathway. A prediction based on this explanation was verified in a final experiment, where frozen-noise performance for NmSm was improved by simultaneously presenting an uncorrelated running noise to the opposite ear.
Similar articles
-
Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.Percept Psychophys. 1990 Mar;47(3):281-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03205002. Percept Psychophys. 1990. PMID: 2326150
-
Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Nov;72(5):1380-3. doi: 10.1121/1.388442. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982. PMID: 7175022
-
NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1720-7. doi: 10.1121/1.399420. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990. PMID: 2341676
-
Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1331-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400537. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991. PMID: 2030220
-
Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jan;81(1):122-8. doi: 10.1121/1.395020. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987. PMID: 3819169
Cited by
-
Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):887-904. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000667. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 30418282 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation to frozen babble in spoken word recognition.J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):EL93-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3073733. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009. PMID: 19275281 Free PMC article.
-
Let's all speak together! Exploring the masking effects of various languages on spoken word identification in multi-linguistic babble.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e65668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065668. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23785442 Free PMC article.
-
Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.Ear Hear. 2021 Mar/Apr;42(2):313-322. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000951. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 32881723 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.Hear Res. 2012 Dec;294(1-2):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 23041187 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous