Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 May;65(5):595-600.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.041814. Epub 2005 Sep 28.

Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints

A K Scheel et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: To perform a prospective long term follow up study comparing conventional radiography (CR), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone erosions and synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) finger joints.

Methods: The metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints II-V (128 joints) of the clinically dominant hand of 16 patients with RA were included. Follow up joint by joint comparisons for erosions and synovitis were made.

Results: At baseline, CR detected erosions in 5/128 (4%) of all joints, US in 12/128 (9%), and MRI in 34/128 (27%). Seven years later, an increase of joints with erosions was found with CR (26%), US (49%) (p<0.001 each), and MRI (32%, NS). In contrast, joint swelling and tenderness assessed by clinical examination were decreased at follow up (p = 0.2, p<0.001). A significant reduction in synovitis with US and MRI (p<0.001 each) was seen. In CR, 12 patients did not have any erosions at baseline, while in 10/12 patients erosions were detected in 25/96 (26%) joints after 7 years. US initially detected erosions in 9 joints, of which two of these joints with erosions were seen by CR at follow up. MRI initially found 34 erosions, of which 14 (41%) were then detected by CR.

Conclusion: After 7 years, an increase of bone erosions was detected by all imaging modalities. In contrast, clinical improvement and regression of synovitis were seen only with US and MRI. More than one third of erosions previously detected by MRI were seen by CR 7 years later.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf K J.et al Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 1999421232–1245. - PubMed
    1. Backhaus M, Burmester G R, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Hess D, Scholz A.et al Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 200261895–904. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wakefield R J, Gibbon W W, Conaghan P G, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C.et al The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000432762–2770. - PubMed
    1. Peterfy C G. Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis: the evolution of clinical applications through clinical trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum 200130375–396. - PubMed
    1. Bird P, Ejbjerg B, McQueen F, Ostergaard M, Lassere M, Edmonds J. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements, J Rheumatol 2003301380–1384. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms