Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Oct;101(4):966-970.
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000169295.08054.fa.

Hepatic resection by the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator increases the incidence and severity of venous air embolism

Bon N Koo  1 , Hae K Kil, Jin-S Choi, Ji Y Kim, Duk H Chun, Yong W Hong
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Hepatic resection by the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator increases the incidence and severity of venous air embolism

Bon N Koo et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

The Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) is an innovative tool for resecting hepatic parenchyma, which reduces intraoperative blood loss and perioperative morbidity. We designed this study to compare the incidence and severity of venous air embolism (VAE) detected via transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during hepatic resection by using either the clamp-crushing method or the CUSA method. Fifty patients scheduled for hepatic resection were randomly assigned to receive hepatic resection by the clamp-crushing method (CC group) or by CUSA (CUSA group). After the induction of anesthesia, the TEE probe was inserted into the patient's esophagus. An independent anesthesiologist graded VAE shown in the 4-chamber view of TEE. All patients in the CUSA group showed VAE during hepatic resection and 44% of the patients had air embolism filling more than half the right heart diameter. In CC group, 68% of the patients showed VAE, which filled less than half the right heart diameter. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics and end-tidal CO2 partial pressure between the two groups. In conclusion, hepatic resection by CUSA increases the incidence and severity of VAE.

Implications: This study demonstrated that venous air embolism during hepatic resection was more frequent and severe when using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator. Although we found no evidence of hemodynamic compromise, increased venous air embolism may increase the risk of paradoxical embolism in patients with liver cirrhosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Yamamoto Y, Ikai I, Kume M, et al. New simple technique for hepatic parenchymal resection using a Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator® and bipolar cautery equipped with a channel for water dripping. World J Surg 1999;23:1032–7.
    1. Papadopoulos G, Kuhly P, Brock M, et al. Venous and paradoxical air embolism in the sitting position: a prospective study with transesophageal echocardiography. Acta Neurochir 1994;126:140–3.
    1. Diakun TA. Carbon dioxide embolism: successful resuscitation with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1991;74:1151–3.
    1. Hashizume M, Takenaka K, Yanaga K, et al. Laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatic cellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1289–91.
    1. Hatano Y, Murakawa M, Segawa H, et al. Venous air embolism during hepatic resection. Anesthesiology 1990;73:1282–5.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources