Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Oct;242(4):540-4; discussion 544-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b.

Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers

Yuman Fong et al. Ann Surg. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have demonstrated that surgical resection at high-volume centers is associated with improved short-term perioperative outcome. Whether long-term results after resection of visceral malignancies are superior at high-volume centers is largely unknown.

Methods: All patients who were subjected to pancreatectomy or hepatectomy for cancer in the years 1995 and 1996 were identified in the National Medicare database. Data extracted and examined include demographics, comorbidities, and long-term survival. All survival was confirmed through 2001, providing actual 5-year survival. Long-term survival was examined as related to hospital volume.

Results: In the study period, there were 2592 pancreatectomies and 3734 hepatectomies performed at 1101 and 1284 institutions, respectively. High-volume center was defined as >25 cases/y. By this definition, there were 10 high-volume centers for pancreatectomy and 12 centers for hepatectomy performing 11% (n = 291) of the pancreatectomies and 12% (n = 474) of the hepatectomies in this study period. Comparison by log-rank demonstrated superior survival for patients resected at high-volume centers (pancreatectomy: P = 0.001; hepatectomy: P = 0.02). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis. All analyses included an adjustment for within-center correlation.

Conclusion: Superior long-term survival is associated with complex visceral resections for cancer at high-volume centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Survival of patients subjected to pancreatic resection for cancer.
None
FIGURE 2. Survival of patients subjected to hepatic resection for cancer.
None
FIGURE 3. Long-term survival of patients who survived the perioperative period (<30 days) after pancreatic resection for cancer.
None
FIGURE 4. Long-term survival of patients who survived the perioperative period (<30 days) after liver resection for cancer.

References

    1. Nagorney DM, Van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM, et al. Primary hepatic malignancy: surgical management and determinants of survival. Surgery. 1989;106:740–748. - PubMed
    1. Balcom JH, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391–398. - PubMed
    1. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, et al. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg. 1995;222:426–434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309–318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Improving results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 1999;23:907–912. - PubMed