Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing
- PMID: 16193269
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2384-9
Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing
Abstract
Simultaneous changes in visual stimulus attributes (such as motion or color) are often perceived to occur at different times, a fact usually attributed to differences in neural processing times of those attributes. However, other studies suggest that perceptual misalignments are not due to stimulus attributes, but to the type of change, first- or second-order. To test whether this idea generalizes across modalities, we studied perceptual synchrony of acoustic and of audiovisual cross-modal stimuli, which varied in a first- or second-order fashion. First-order changes were abrupt changes in tone intensity or frequency (auditory), or spatial position (visual), while second-order changes were an inversion of the direction of change, such as a turning point when a rising tone starts falling or a translating visual blob reverses. For both pure acoustic and cross-modal stimuli, first-order changes were systematically perceived before second-order changes. However, when both changes were first-order, or both were second-order, little or no difference in perceptual delay was found between them, regardless of attribute or modality. This shows that the type of attribute change, as well as latency differences, is a strong determinant of subjective temporal alignments. We also performed an analysis of reaction times (RTs) to the first- and second-order attribute changes used in these temporal alignment experiments. RT differences between these stimuli did not correspond with our temporal alignment data, suggesting that subjective alignments cannot be accounted for by a simple latency-based explanation.
Similar articles
-
Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16859421
-
Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):273-284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02812-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37932495
-
Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.Neurosci Lett. 2008 Mar 15;433(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.01.031. Epub 2008 Jan 18. Neurosci Lett. 2008. PMID: 18281153
-
Motor action reduces temporal asynchrony between perceived visual changes.J Vis. 2012 Oct 23;12(11):20. doi: 10.1167/12.11.20. J Vis. 2012. PMID: 23092948
-
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21. Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16497283
Cited by
-
Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(4):525-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1254-z. Epub 2008 Jan 9. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18183376
-
Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal.Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 7;273(1588):865-74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3327. Proc Biol Sci. 2006. PMID: 16618681 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):465-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2386-7. Epub 2005 Jul 19. Exp Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16028031 Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources