Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2005 Dec;95(5-6):436-46.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-0048-x. Epub 2005 Sep 29.

Resistance and functional training reduces knee extensor position fluctuations in functionally limited older adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Resistance and functional training reduces knee extensor position fluctuations in functionally limited older adults

Todd M Manini et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of task-specificity on knee extensor steadiness adaptations in functionally limited older adults. Twenty-four functionally limited older adults (74.6+/-7.6 years: 22 women, 2 men) completed a 10-week control period followed by 10 weeks (2 days/week) of resistance (RT), functional (FT) (practicing everyday tasks, i.e., chair rises) or functional + resistance (FRT) training, which featured both shortening and lengthening movements. During testing, subjects performed a steady isometric [10, 25, 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] and shortening/lengthening (5, 30, 65% of MVC) knee extensor contractions. There were no steadiness (isometric, shortening or lengthening contractions) changes in the control period and no adaptations in isometric steadiness due to training. RT induced a 37% reduction in shortening fluctuations at 5% of MVC and 35% reduction in lengthening fluctuations at both 30% and 65% of MVC. FRT induced a 60% reduction in shortening fluctuations at 30% of MVC. No adaptations in dynamic steadiness were observed in the FT group. Further analysis indicated that those who were the least steady at baseline showed the greatest training effects during isometric (RT: R (2)=0.25, FRT: R (2)=0.49, FT: R (2)=0.38), shortening (RT: R (2)=0.36, FRT: R (2)=0.36, FT: R (2)=0.35) and lengthening (RT: r (2)=0.29, FRT: r (2)=0.44) contractions. In conclusion, steadiness improvements in groups performing resistance exercise, without a concomitant improvement in the FT group, supports a role for task-specificity in explaining steadiness adaptations, particularly for unsteady older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Apr;96(4):1530-40 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55(1):100-5 - PubMed
    1. Muscle Nerve. 2000 May;23(5):771-8 - PubMed
    1. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Nov;15(4):519-23 - PubMed
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):625-34 - PubMed

Publication types