The appropriateness of Multicriteria Analysis in environmental decision-making problems
- PMID: 16196404
- DOI: 10.1080/09593332608618484
The appropriateness of Multicriteria Analysis in environmental decision-making problems
Abstract
Environmental decision-making occurs in numerous environmental sectors and covers a diverse range of problems. Of the various decision tools available not all of them may be appropriate for any single decision problem, and any particular decision-aid may not be applicable in all decision problems. This article reviews applications of MCA, and considers the appropriateness of Multicriteria Analysis (MCA) in environmental decision-making problems. Due to natural and decision environments being multidimensional, environmental decision-making is characterized by complexity. Consequently MCA has commonly been used in this area. In Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) the multiple dimensions of the impacts evaluated have been easily represented in MCA as multiple criteria. Waste management and water resource planning problems involving public participation have been facilitated by MCA, through the structuring and articulation of the public's values. MCA has also been applied in water quality problems, allowing the incorporation of incommensurable criteria into evaluations. The appropriateness of MCA for environmental decision problems can be viewed in the context of a typical decision-making process, making it easier to identify the contribution MCA can make at various decision-making stages. MCA can be particularly appropriate when the decision-making context is characterized by multiple objectives and multiple criteria, incommensurable criteria, mixed data and the need for ease of use, and the analysis context is characterized by multiple participants.
Similar articles
-
Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.Risk Anal. 2009 Jan;29(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x. Epub 2008 Sep 29. Risk Anal. 2009. PMID: 18826413
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Degradation model: a quantitative EIA instrument, acting as a decision support system (DSS) for environmental management.Environ Manage. 2002 Jul;30(1):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-2647-6. Environ Manage. 2002. PMID: 12053248
-
Decision-making in environmental health.World Health Stat Q. 1995;48(2):164-70. World Health Stat Q. 1995. PMID: 8585235
-
Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3578-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jul 18. Sci Total Environ. 2011. PMID: 21764422 Review.
Cited by
-
Screening and prioritisation of chemical risks from metal mining operations, identifying exposure media of concern.Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Apr;163(1-4):555-71. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0858-0. Epub 2009 Apr 8. Environ Monit Assess. 2010. PMID: 19353294
-
A multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework: development and application in comparing two food waste management options using a UK region as a case study.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(36):35821-35834. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2479-z. Epub 2018 Jun 14. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29948712
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources