Suppression of the histamine-induced wheal and flare response by fexofenadine HCl 60 mg twice daily, loratadine 10 mg once daily and placebo in healthy Japanese volunteers
- PMID: 16197669
- DOI: 10.1185/030079905X59175
Suppression of the histamine-induced wheal and flare response by fexofenadine HCl 60 mg twice daily, loratadine 10 mg once daily and placebo in healthy Japanese volunteers
Abstract
Background: The effects of the selective H1-receptor antagonist fexofenadine have been widely demonstrated in Western populations; however, to date, limited data comparing the effects of fexofenadine with other antihistamines have been reported in Japanese subjects.
Objective: To investigate the effect of fexofenadine and loratadine on the histamine-induced cutaneous wheal and flare response in healthy Japanese volunteers.
Methods: Eighteen healthy male and female Japanese volunteers aged 20-53 years were randomized to receive fexofenadine HCl 60 mg twice daily, loratadine 10 mg once daily or placebo in a 1-day, three-period, double-blind, crossover study. For each treatment, the wheal and flare response to 100 mg/mL histamine was assessed at baseline and at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Results: Fexofenadine produced significantly greater percentage suppression of the overall wheal response compared with placebo and loratadine (43.1% versus 10.0% and 15.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Similarly, fexofenadine significantly suppressed the overall flare response compared with placebo and loratadine (43.0% versus 3.5% and -8.9%, respectively; p < 0.01). Loratadine was statistically no different from placebo in terms of both overall wheal and flare suppression. Area under the curve analysis for wheal and flare reduction (0-12 hours post-dose) confirmed these findings. For wheal inhibition, fexofenadine had a significantly faster onset of action (defined as time to > or = 35% inhibition) compared with placebo (p < 0.001) and loratadine (p < 0.01); for flare, fexofenadine had a significantly faster onset of action than loratadine (p < 0.01). Mean maximum inhibition (the mean of the greatest inhibition achieved from baseline for each treatment) for wheal was achieved significantly faster with fexofenadine than loratadine (p < 0.01), and fexofenadine had a significantly longer duration of effect on suppressing wheal and flare compared with placebo and loratadine (p < 0.05 for all). The antihistamine effects of fexofenadine correlated significantly with its Cmax, while loratadine activity did not correlate significantly with its plasma levels.
Conclusions: Fexofenadine is a potent suppressor of the histamine-induced wheal and flare response in healthy Japanese volunteers. These results support findings in Caucasian subjects, and confirm that fexofenadine has greater antihistaminergic activity than loratadine in this human model.
Similar articles
-
A double-blind, randomized, single-dose, crossover comparison of levocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response during 24 hours in healthy male subjects.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Feb;88(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61995-3. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002. PMID: 11868924 Clinical Trial.
-
Relative potency of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, and placebo using a skin test model of wheal-and-flare suppression.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003 Jun;90(6):629-34. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61867-4. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003. PMID: 12839321 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy of wheal-and-flare suppression among various non-sedating antihistamines and the pharmacologic insights to their efficacy.J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 May;87(5):551-6. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004. PMID: 15222528 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):921-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.017. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19539095 Review.
-
Appraisal of the validity of histamine-induced wheal and flare to predict the clinical efficacy of antihistamines.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Feb;99(2):S798-806. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70128-3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997. PMID: 9042073 Review.
Cited by
-
A Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach for fexofenadine: predictive pharmacokinetic insights in humans.Saudi Pharm J. 2025 Jul 9;33(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00024-4. Saudi Pharm J. 2025. PMID: 40632356 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Fexofenadine: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics. 2024 Dec 20;16(12):1619. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121619. Pharmaceutics. 2024. PMID: 39771597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does Ethnic Variability Exist in the Systemic Exposures of OATP1A2 Substrates-Fexofenadine in Taiwanese?Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;77(5):573-8. doi: 10.4103/0250-474x.169032. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015. PMID: 26798172 Free PMC article.
-
Antihistamine effects and safety of fexofenadine: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Nov 29;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40360-019-0363-1. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019. PMID: 31783781 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical