Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Jun;22(6):553-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.011. Epub 2005 Sep 29.

Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry

Alvin G Wee  1 , Delwin T Lindsey, Shanglun Kuo, William M Johnston
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry

Alvin G Wee et al. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The use of calibrated, commercial digital cameras for dental applications is promising. The color accuracy of various calibration models were evaluated as applied to three commercial digital cameras for use in dental color matching.

Methods: CIE LAB values of 264 color patches and 65 shade tabs were measured with a spectroradiometer. Digital images of the samples were taken with the Nikon D100, Canon D60 and Sigma SD9 cameras. Four regression models were formulated from the color patch CIE LAB and the digital image values. Shade tab CIE LAB colors were predicted by applying the digital image values into the calibration models and were compared to the measured CIE LAB values. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test determined if the 12 camera/calibration models differed significantly from the color measurement setup.

Results: Every camera/calibration model (DeltaE's ranging from 1.79 to 5.25) showed a statistically significant difference from the color measurement setup.

Significance: Commercial SLR digital cameras when combined with the appropriate calibration protocols showed potential for use in the color replication process of clinical dentistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic view of the experimental set-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of research model per digital camera.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stability of experimental setup.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM. Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(6):657–66. - PubMed
    1. Zyman P, Etienne JM. Recording and communicating shade with digital photography: concepts and considerations. Pract Proceed Aesthet Dent. 2002;14(1):49–51. [53 passim] - PubMed
    1. Chu SJ, Tarnow DP. Digital shade analysis and verification: a case report and discussion. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13(2):129–36. [quiz 138] - PubMed
    1. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Color Res Appl. 1979;4:83–91.
    1. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrument colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1760–4. - PubMed

Publication types