Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity
- PMID: 16199067
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.038
Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity
Abstract
The ability to perceive taste from temperature alone ("thermal taste") was recently shown to predict higher perceptual responsiveness to gustatory and olfactory stimuli. This relationship was hypothesized to be due in part to individual differences in CNS processes involved in flavor perception. Here we report three experiments that tested whether subjects who differ in responsiveness to thermal taste and/or chemical taste also differ in responsiveness to oral chemesthesis. In experiment 1, subjects identified as 'thermal tasters' (TTs) or 'thermal non-tasters' (TnTs) used the general Labeled Magnitude Scale to rate the intensity of sensations produced on the tongue tip by capsaicin, menthol, sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, and QSO4. TTs rated all four taste stimuli higher than did TnTs, whereas sensations of burning/stinging/pricking and temperature from capsaicin and menthol did not differ significantly between groups. In experiment 2, testing with capsaicin on both the front and back of the tongue confirmed there was no difference in ratings of burning/stinging/pricking when subjects were grouped according to the ability to perceive thermal taste. In experiment 3, subjects were classified as high- or low-tasters according to their ratings of sucrose sweetness rather than thermal taste. No group difference was found for perception of capsaicin even when presented in mixture with sucrose or NaCl. The results are discussed in the context of previous evidence of an association between chemesthesis and sensitivity to the bitter tastant PROP, and in terms of the various peripheral and central neural processes that may underlie intensity perception in taste and chemesthesis.
Similar articles
-
Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations.Physiol Behav. 2008 Nov 28;95(4):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Aug 22. Physiol Behav. 2008. PMID: 18773913 Clinical Trial.
-
'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor.Chem Senses. 2004 Sep;29(7):617-28. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh065. Chem Senses. 2004. PMID: 15337686 Clinical Trial.
-
Capsaicin as a probe of the relationship between bitter taste and chemesthesis.Physiol Behav. 2003 Sep;79(4-5):811-21. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00213-0. Physiol Behav. 2003. PMID: 12954427 Clinical Trial.
-
Neural coding of gustatory information.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Aug;9(4):427-35. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80064-6. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999. PMID: 10448155 Review.
-
[Methods of taste sensitivity examination].Wiad Lek. 2008;61(7-9):207-10. Wiad Lek. 2008. PMID: 19172833 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula.Chem Senses. 2010 Oct;35(8):693-703. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq068. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Chem Senses. 2010. PMID: 20595201 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025 Jul;24(4):e70223. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70223. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2025. PMID: 40625310 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jun 22;16:865929. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.865929. eCollection 2022. Front Syst Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35813269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of club soda and ginger brew on linguapalatal pressures in healthy swallowing.Dysphagia. 2012 Jun;27(2):228-39. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9358-9. Epub 2011 Aug 3. Dysphagia. 2012. PMID: 21811834
-
Thermal taster status: Evidence of cross-modal integration.Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Jun;37(6):2263-75. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23171. Epub 2016 Mar 7. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016. PMID: 26947429 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources