SEM-EDX study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids
- PMID: 16199281
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.002
SEM-EDX study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of gingival retraction fluids (GRF) on prepared dentine surfaces, and to test the null-hypothesis that prior exposure of dentine surfaces for prolonged period to any of the fluids evaluated does not influence acid-etching of the exposed surfaces.
Methods: The investigation was carried out using SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). The GRF studied were Hemodent (HMDT), Astringedent (AST) and Ultradent buffered 25% Aluminium Chloride (ULTB). Longitudinal sections of 220-grit ground dentine surfaces were exposed to GRF for 0.5-, 1-, 2- and 5-min (n=4 each). Another group of samples was produced by 20s application of 35% phosphoric acid (PA) on GRF-pretreated dentine. Control samples were not exposed to GRF. Differences in etching effect-a function of the Ca-contents detected by EDX, were analysed using Friedman's and Wilcoxon's rank test (P<0.05).
Results: The SEM demonstrated the presence of a relatively non-porous amorphous dentine matrix, but many of the dentine tubule orifices remained occluded. Granular precipitates, which remained even after acid-etching, were noted on surfaces exposed to Hemodent for 5 min. Characteristic crystal growth was observed on surfaces exposed to Astringedent for 1- or 2-min prior to acid-etching. The EDX data demonstrated that there were differences in resulting Ca-content; ULTB >AST>HMDT>ULTB+PA>HMDT+PA>AST+PA>PA, but AST and HMDT were not significantly different.
Conclusions: The exposure of dentine prepared surfaces to these three GRF altered its morphology and reduced the dentine's susceptibility to acid-etching, thus the null-hypothesis is rejected.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
