[Comparing the characteristics of psychophysical tests between cochlear implant children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and normal inner ear]
- PMID: 16200824
[Comparing the characteristics of psychophysical tests between cochlear implant children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and normal inner ear]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the characteristics of psychophysical tests between cochlear implant children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and normal inner ear and to analyse the characteristics of psychophysical and impedance tests for cochlear implant patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.
Method: One hundred and thirty-one cochlear implant pre-lingual deafness patients participated in this study. They received cochlear implant surgery at the age of 1.5 to 12 years old from Nov, 1998 to Aug, 2003. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A had 111 patients with normal inner ear. Group B had 20 patients with radiographically proven large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. All of the patients were inserted with Nucleus 24M. The time of the first programming session was approximately 4 weeks after surgery. The psychophysical tests included T and C-Level tests. The programming techniques used in the test were suitable for the age of the patients. The R116 and R126 software were used to test the impedance of the electrodes automatically.
Result: Using the independent-samples t-test, the impedance and T/C-Level of each electrode did not differ significantly between group A and B ( P > 0.05). The impedance and T/C-Level were not significantly different between group A and B at the time of switch-on, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year after switch-on (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The parameters of mapping were not significantly different between cochlear implant children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and normal inner ear. The management and procedure of mapping used in cochlear implant children with normal inner ear can be used in the children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.
Similar articles
-
[Implication of cochlear implantation in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Apr;38(2):104-7. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003. PMID: 12889106 Chinese.
-
Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: Impedance changes over time with different cochlear implant electrode arrays.Cochlear Implants Int. 2015;16(6):326-30. doi: 10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000013. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Cochlear Implants Int. 2015. PMID: 26098963
-
[Study of electrode impedance and NRT value characteristics with cochlear implants in children with malformed inner ear and normal inner ear].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;27(22):1231-3. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24616978 Chinese.
-
Management of surgical difficulties during cochlear implant with inner ear anomalies.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;92:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28012532 Review.
-
Cochlear implantation in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct. A case series with literature review.Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 May;18(3):125-129. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1268754. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017. PMID: 28120638 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical