[Dangerous liaisons--physicians and pharmaceutical sales representatives]
- PMID: 16202335
[Dangerous liaisons--physicians and pharmaceutical sales representatives]
Abstract
Interactions between physicians and detailers (even when legitimate ones) raise scientific and ethical questions. In Portugal little thinking and discussion has been done on the subject and the blames for bribery have monopolized the media. This work intended to review what has been said in medical literature about these interactions. How do physicians see themselves when interacting with pharmaceutical companies and their representatives? Do these companies in fact change their prescriptive behaviour, and, if so, how do they change it? How can physicians interact with detailers and still keep their best practice? A Medline research, from 1966 till 2002, was performed using the key-words as follows. A database similar to Medline but concerning medical journals published in Portugal, Index das Revistas Médicas Portuguesas, was also researched from 1992 to 2002. Pharmaceutical companies are profit bound and they allot promoting activities, and detailing in particular, huge amounts of money. Most physicians hold firmly to the belief that they are able to resist and not be influenced by drug companies promotion activities. Nevertheless, all previous works on literature tell us the opposite. Market research also indicates that detailers effectively promote drug sales. Various works also suggest that the information detailers provide to physicians may be largely incorrect, even comparing it to the written information provided by the pharmaceutical companies they work for. The frequency at which portuguese physicians (especially family physicians) contact with pharmaceutical sales representatives is higher than the frequency reported in countries where the available studies come from (namely, Canada and the United States of America). This may put portuguese physicians at a higher risk, making it imperative that work and wide debate are initiated among the class.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with physicians' reliance on pharmaceutical sales representatives.Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):994-1002. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace53a. Acad Med. 2009. PMID: 19638762
-
Proposed guidelines for housestaff interaction with pharmaceutical companies.Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1993 Oct;26(5):291-3. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1993. PMID: 15362243
-
[The attitude of physicians regarding the promotion strategies of the pharmaceutical industry].Medicina (B Aires). 2005;65(3):247-51. Medicina (B Aires). 2005. PMID: 16042137 Spanish.
-
What information do physicians receive from pharmaceutical representatives?Can Fam Physician. 1997 May;43:941-5. Can Fam Physician. 1997. PMID: 9154366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conflict of interest in the physician interface with the biomedical industry.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;24(3):671-85. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2006.05.008. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 16877136 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of pharmaceutical promotion on prescribing decisions of general practitioners in Eastern Turkey.BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 25;7:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-122. BMC Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17592644 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources