Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
- PMID: 16202353
Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of single bolus dose of esmolol or fentanyl in attenuating the haemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
Design: Randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study.
Place and duration of study: Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Civil Hospital, Karachi, from December 1998 to November 1999.
Patients and methods: Sixty adult ASA-I and ASA-II patients undergoing elective surgery were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups i.e., A, B and C. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were recorded as 0= baseline and after administration of study drug, laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation and 10 minutes thereafter. Study agent was injected 30 seconds before the induction of anaesthesia. Group 'A' (control) received 10 ml saline, group 'B' and group 'C' received fentanyl 2 mg/kg and esmolol 2 mg/kg respectively diluted to make a total volume of 10 ml in normal saline.
Results: Readings of heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures were compared with baseline and among each group. The rise in heart rate was minimal in esmolol group and was statistically significant. Following intubation, blood pressure was increased in all groups but was least in group C.
Conclusion: Bolus injection of fentanyl 2 mg/kg 2 minutes prior to laryngoscopy and intubation failed to protect against elevation of both the heart rate and systolic blood pressure, whereas esmolol at 2 mg/kg provided consistent and reliable protection against the increase of heart rate but not arterial blood pressure.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of esmolol and fentanyl in controlling increases in heart rate and blood pressure during endotracheal intubation.AANA J. 1991 Feb;59(1):91-6. AANA J. 1991. PMID: 1672049 Clinical Trial.
-
The dose-related effects of bolus esmolol on heart rate and blood pressure following laryngoscopy and intubation.AANA J. 2000 Oct;68(5):437-42. AANA J. 2000. PMID: 11759128 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1996 Jun;34(2):61-7. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1996. PMID: 9084524 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of esmolol on QTc interval changes during tracheal intubation: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e028111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028111. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31023764 Free PMC article.
-
Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Mar;28(3):190-202. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199528030-00002. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995. PMID: 7758250 Review.
Cited by
-
The comparison of dexmedetomidine, esmolol, and combination of dexmedetomidine with esmolol for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Oct-Dec;22(4):353-357. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_112_18. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019. PMID: 31621668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative evaluation of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in neurosurgical patients.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):186-90. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.155146. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25948898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials