Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;71(10):6026-32.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6026-6032.2005.

Factors associated with the presence of coliforms in the feed and water of feedlot cattle

Michael W Sanderson  1 , Jan M Sargeant, David G Renter, D Dee Griffin, Robert A Smith
Affiliations

Factors associated with the presence of coliforms in the feed and water of feedlot cattle

Michael W Sanderson et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate coliform counts in feedlot cattle water and feed rations and their associations with management, climate, fecal material, and water Escherichia coli O157 using a cross-sectional study design. Coliform counts were performed on feed samples from 671 pens on 70 feedlots and on water samples from 702 pens on 72 feedlots in four U.S. states collected between May and August 2001. Management and climate factors were obtained by survey and observation. Month of sampling (higher in May and June), presence of corn silage in the ration (negative association), temperature of the feed 1 in. (ca. 2.5 cm) below the surface at the time of sampling (negative association), and wind velocity at the time of sampling (positive association) were significantly associated with log10 coliform levels in feed. Month of sampling (lower in May versus June July and August), water pH (negative association), and water total solids (positive association) were significantly associated with log10 water coliform levels. Coliform counts in feed and water were not associated with prevalence of E. coli O157 in cattle feces or water. Management risk factors must be interpreted with caution but the results reported here do not support the use of coliform counts as a marker for E. coli O157 contamination of feed or water.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Public Health Association. 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th ed. Water Environment Federation, Baltimore, Md.
    1. Besser, T. E., B. L. Richards, D. H. Rice, and D. D. Hancock. 2001. Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection of calves: infectious dose and direct contact transmission. Epidemiol. Infect. 127:555-560. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrne, C. M., P. O'Kiely, D. J. Bolton, J. J. Sheridan, D. A. McDowell, and I. S. Blair. 2002. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during silage fermentation. J. Food Prot. 65:1854-1860. - PubMed
    1. Carter, G. R., and D. J. Wise. 2004. Essentials of veterinary bacteriology and mycology. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
    1. Davis, M. A., D. D. Hancock, D. H. Rice, D. R. Call, R. DiGiacomo, M. Samadpour, and T. E. Besser. 2003. Feedstuffs as a vehicle of cattle exposure to Escherichia coli O157 and Salmonella enterica. Vet. Microbiol. 95:199-210. - PubMed

Publication types