The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up
- PMID: 16205346
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181061.43194.18
The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up
Abstract
Study design: Prospective, longitudinal minimum 2-year follow-up.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Prodisc implant in patients with disabling multilevel discogenic low back pain (LBP).
Summary of background data: Few, if any, alternatives have been proposed to treat recalcitrant and debilitating multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain. To date, a prospective study specifically examining the use of multilevel Prodisc total disc arthroplasty has not been described.
Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on 25 patients (63 prostheses) treated with multilevel lumbar ProDisc total disc arthroplasty. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients 18 to 60 years of age with disabling discogenic low back pain and minimal radicular pain secondary to multiple level lumbar spondylosis from L1 to S1 were included. Preoperative and postoperative disability and pain scores were measured using Oswestry and visual analog scores. Preoperative and postoperative neurologic, radiographic, and pain medication assessments were also performed at similar postoperative intervals.
Results: A total of 29 patients (72 prostheses) were enrolled in the prospective analysis. Twenty-five patients (63 prostheses) fulfilled all follow-up criteria and are included for final analysis. Fifteen bisegmental and 10 trisegmental level cases were performed. Visual analog pain, Oswestry, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly reduced at the 3-month as well as at 48-month follow-up. Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increases from 5 mm to 12 mm (P < 0.05) and affected disc motions from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.05). No change in adjacent level disc heights was seen. Complications included a single case of subsidence of the inferior endplate of the L4-L5 segment in a bisegmental L4-L5/L5-S1 case. We also report a delayed case of anterior extrusion of a polyethylene component in a patient who had sustained a fall of a bicycle.
Conclusions: Our preliminary data on multisegmental ProDisc lumbar total disc arthroplasty appear to be a safe and efficacious treatment method for debilitating lumbar spondylosis without significant facet arthropathy. In our select (non-Workers Compensation and/or medical legal) cohort of patients, we demonstrate a patient satisfaction rate of 93%. Careful and appropriate patient selection is essential in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes.
Similar articles
-
The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2230-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182217.87660.40. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16205353
-
Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):85-90. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.85. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006. PMID: 16506473 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17495770 Clinical Trial.
-
Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:50-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01066. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 16510800 Review.
-
Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S60-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174511.66830.e9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16103835 Review.
Cited by
-
Single-Level Rigid Fixation Combined with Coflex: A Biomechanical Study.Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 29;22:1022-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.896706. Med Sci Monit. 2016. PMID: 27021044 Free PMC article.
-
Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of discogenic low back pain.World J Orthop. 2013 Apr 18;4(2):42-52. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i2.42. Print 2013 Apr 18. World J Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23610750 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation.Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1534-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1432-8. Epub 2010 May 21. Eur Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20490873 Free PMC article.
-
Radiographic disk height increase after a trial of multimodal spine rehabilitation and vibration traction: a retrospective case series.J Chiropr Med. 2008 Dec;7(4):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.08.001. J Chiropr Med. 2008. PMID: 19646376 Free PMC article.
-
ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 12;9:7. doi: 10.14444/2007. eCollection 2015. Int J Spine Surg. 2015. PMID: 25785243 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous