Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Jul;23(3):405-19.

Diagnosis of nerve root compression. Myelography, computed tomography, and MRI

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1620535
Review

Diagnosis of nerve root compression. Myelography, computed tomography, and MRI

G R Bell et al. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jul.

Abstract

Current technology and published studies support the preferential use of MRI in the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy. In cervical radiculopathy, data support the use of either contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. We prefer MRI as the initial diagnostic test because of the obvious advantage of its noninvasive nature. Similar to myelography, MRI permits visualization of the entire cervical canal and spinal cord. Unlike routine CT, MRI visualizes the spinal cord and nerve roots in two planes and is better in detecting unsuspected pathology at other cervical segmental levels. Because the quality of MRI scans in the cervical spine is subject to more variation than in the lumbar spine, anticipated pathology is sometimes not clearly visualized by cervical MRI. Under such circumstances, we obtain a water-soluble myelogram followed by contrast-enhanced CT. Because inaccurate radiographic diagnosis is one of the identifiable causes of poor outcome in surgical therapy for cervical spondylosis, accurate visualization of pathology in terms of its location, nature, and extent is imperative before performing decompressive cervical spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms