This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2005 Oct;2(10):482-3.

doi: 10.1038/ncponc0318.

How to judge a tumor marker

Ethan M Katz¹, Michael W Kattan

Affiliations

PMID: 16205748
DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0318

Review

How to judge a tumor marker

Ethan M Katz et al. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Oct.

. 2005 Oct;2(10):482-3.

doi: 10.1038/ncponc0318.

Authors

Ethan M Katz¹, Michael W Kattan

Affiliation

¹ Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA. ekatz@bio.ri.ccf.org

PMID: 16205748
DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0318

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM; Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics. McShane LM, et al. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Aug;2(8):416-22. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16130938

Publication types

Actions
Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.