This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1999;25(1-2):99-137.

M King

M King. Thurgood Marshall Law Rev. 1999.

. 1999;25(1-2):99-137.

M King

No abstract available

Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Trespalacios MJ. Trespalacios MJ. Univ Miami Law Rev. 1992 Jan;46(3):803-34. Univ Miami Law Rev. 1992. PMID: 16047447 No abstract available.
Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
Malo PE. Malo PE. DePaul J Health Care Law. 1999-2000;3:307-34. DePaul J Health Care Law. 1999. PMID: 15929238 No abstract available.
In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
Ellis M. Ellis M. Santa Clara Law Rev. 2002;42(4):1191-225. Santa Clara Law Rev. 2002. PMID: 15212074 No abstract available.
Assisted reproductive technologies and the pregnancy process: developing an equality model to protect reproductive liberties.
Daar JF. Daar JF. Am J Law Med. 1999;25(4):455-77. Am J Law Med. 1999. PMID: 10629732 Review. No abstract available.
In re: the disposition of frozen embryos: 2022.
Letterie G. Letterie G. Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):477-480. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Feb 5. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 35131103 Review.