The influence of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for preventing triple lumen catheter infections in critically ill surgical and trauma patients
- PMID: 1621197
The influence of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for preventing triple lumen catheter infections in critically ill surgical and trauma patients
Abstract
One hundred and ninety-one triple lumen central venous catheters were placed into 107 sites in 81 surgical and trauma patients who were prospectively studied to determine the rate of catheter related infection using a subcutaneous cuff of biodegradable collagen containing bactericidal silver and a guide wire exchange protocol. Thirty-seven sites in 36 nonseptic patients (group 1) were compared with 70 sites in 45 septic patients (group 2). The data were also compared with data consecutively collected one year earlier, using the same exchange protocol without the cuff. Fourteen of 70 sites in group 2 had catheter related infections, with seven causing bloodstream infection. Five of 14 were the result of fungus, with three causing fungemia. Two of 37 sites in group 1 had catheter related infections (p = 0.044), with no associated bacteremia. The number of triple lumen catheter related infections and associated bacteremia or fungemia are higher in septic patients compared with nonseptic critically ill surgical and trauma patients. The cuff significantly prolongs time of catheter site use in patients who are nonseptic, but may be of no benefit in reducing infection rates or prolonging site use time in patients who are septic and may predispose to fungal colonization.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of silver-impregnated with standard multi-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients.Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1032-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259378.53166.1B. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17334256 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.J Hosp Infect. 2006 Feb;62(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.06.030. Epub 2005 Nov 22. J Hosp Infect. 2006. PMID: 16307824 Clinical Trial.
-
Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population.Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1139-43. Arch Intern Med. 1989. PMID: 2497712
-
Bloodstream infection related to catheter connections: a prospective trial of two connection systems.J Hosp Infect. 2007 Sep;67(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Aug 27. J Hosp Infect. 2007. PMID: 17719682 Clinical Trial.
-
Rates of infection for single-lumen versus multilumen central venous catheters: a meta-analysis.Crit Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2385-90. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000084843.31852.01. Crit Care Med. 2003. PMID: 14501971 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevention of infections caused by central venous catheters--established and novel measures.Infection. 1999;27 Suppl 1:S11-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02561611. Infection. 1999. PMID: 10379437 Review.
-
A prospective, randomized evaluation of the effect of silver impregnated subcutaneous cuffs for preventing tunneled chronic venous access catheter infections in cancer patients.Ann Surg. 1993 Aug;218(2):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199308000-00014. Ann Surg. 1993. PMID: 8343002 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Drug use in infection control--is more less?Infection. 1993 May-Jun;21(3):135-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01710528. Infection. 1993. PMID: 8365808 No abstract available.
-
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are not superior to central venous catheters in the acute care of surgical patients on the ward.World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1605-19. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0174-y. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16865322 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical