Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a patient survey
- PMID: 16213232
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.009
Benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a patient survey
Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether participation in an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (OCR) program increases exercise levels and decreases shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
Design: Retrospective comparative survey.
Setting: University tertiary-care ICD clinic.
Participants: Patients with ICDs and coronary artery disease.
Intervention: Participation in OCR (nonrandomized).
Main outcome measures: Exercise levels and OCR participation were determined through a telephone survey of patients with ICDs. The incidence of shock-treated arrhythmia was determined by review of charts and ICD data storage disks.
Results: Of 82 patients (85% men; mean age, 61+/-8 y), 28 (34%) participated in OCR after receiving an ICD. There was no difference in age, sex, ejection fraction, or length of follow-up between OCR and non-OCR groups. Median intensity of regular exercise was 5.3 metabolic equivalents (METS) for OCR patients versus 3.5 METS for non-OCR patients (P<.02). In follow-up (mean, 48+/-3 mo), non-OCR patients were more likely to receive any shock, shocks during exercise, or shocks for ventricular arrhythmia during exercise than OCR patients (all P<.05). Non-OCR remained a predictor of shock after adjustment for exercise limitation (P<.05).
Conclusions: OCR patients exercised more and had fewer shocks. Physicians and health plans should encourage ICD patients to participate in OCR.
Similar articles
-
Outpatient rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery and peripheral arterial occlusive disease.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):618-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.040. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008. PMID: 18373990
-
A comparison of outcomes for patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary vs secondary-prevention.Conn Med. 2008 Jun-Jul;72(6):329-33. Conn Med. 2008. PMID: 18610705
-
Concerns about the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a determinant of anxiety and depressive symptoms independent of experienced shocks.Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4):664-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.031. Am Heart J. 2005. PMID: 15990750
-
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and the need for concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep;12(3):175-80. doi: 10.1177/1074248407305608. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17875944 Review.
-
Exercise testing and training in patients with malignant arrhythmias.Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997;25:235-69. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997. PMID: 9213094 Review.
Cited by
-
COPE-ICD: a randomised clinical trial studying the effects and meaning of a comprehensive rehabilitation programme for ICD recipients -design, intervention and population.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Jun 17;11:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-33. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011. PMID: 21682864 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current concept in the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with congestive heart failure.World J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):183-203. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i7.183. World J Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34367503 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antiarrhythmic effect of 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation and its influence on cardiovascular mortality in long-term follow-up - subanalysis of the TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure Patients randomized clinical trial.Arch Med Sci. 2021 May 22;18(2):293-306. doi: 10.5114/aoms/136563. eCollection 2022. Arch Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 35316910 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise Interventions in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Sep;39(5):308-317. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000389. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019. PMID: 31397767 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Rehabilitation in German Speaking Countries of Europe-Evidence-Based Guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH-Part 2.J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 12;10(14):3071. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143071. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34300237 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical