Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect
- PMID: 16213655
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001
Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect
Abstract
We report an experiment designed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the visuotactile crossmodal congruency effect. Vibrotactile targets were presented randomly to the index finger (top side of a hand-held cube) or thumb (bottom side) of either hand while visual distractors were presented randomly from one of the same four possible locations. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the vibrotactile target and the visual distractor was varied on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants made speeded discrimination responses regarding the elevation of the vibrotactile targets (i.e., upper versus lower) while trying to ignore the visual distractors. The largest crossmodal congruency effects (defined as the difference in performance between incongruent and congruent elevation distractor trials) were obtained when the visual distractor preceded the vibrotactile target by 50-100 ms, although significant effects were also reported when the distractor followed the target by as much as 100 ms. These results are discussed in terms of the conjoint influence of response competition, crossmodal perceptual interactions (i.e., the ventriloquism effect), and exogenous spatial attention on the crossmodal congruency effect. The distinct temporal signatures of each of these effects are also highlighted.
Similar articles
-
On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Jan-Feb;118(1-2):47-70. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.003. Epub 2004 Nov 23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005. PMID: 15627409
-
Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(4):507-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Aug 11. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16098997
-
Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Feb;124(2):190-208. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Jun 8. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007. PMID: 16759624
-
Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):171-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477031 Review.
-
Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):148-69. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.148. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15460922
Cited by
-
Investigating visual-tactile interactions over time and space in adults with autism.J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Oct;45(10):3316-26. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2492-8. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015. PMID: 26063447
-
Brief Report: Which Came First? Exploring Crossmodal Temporal Order Judgements and Their Relationship with Sensory Reactivity in Autism and Neurotypicals.J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Jan;47(1):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2925-z. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017. PMID: 27704294 Free PMC article.
-
The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):285-294. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02788-0. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 37759149 Free PMC article.
-
The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):873-887. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4849-4. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Exp Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 27913817
-
Temporal Electroencephalography Traits Dissociating Tactile Information and Cross-Modal Congruence Effects.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;24(1):45. doi: 10.3390/s24010045. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38202907 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources