Similar articles

• The difference in pregnancy rates between elective single embryo transfer (SET) compared to double embryo transfer is dependent on the implantation rates of embryos being transferred. Using mathematical modeling to determine when SET becomes a viable option.

  Thompson J, Lane M. Thompson J, et al. Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):2195; author reply 2195-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del241. Hum Reprod. 2006. PMID: 16887928 No abstract available.
• Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study.

  Urman B, Yakin K, Ata B, Isiklar A, Balaban B. Urman B, et al. Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):604-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1294. Epub 2007 Oct 23. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17936283 Clinical Trial.
• A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two embryo transfer catheters in an ART program.

  Saldeen P, Abou-Setta AM, Bergh T, Sundström P, Holte J. Saldeen P, et al. Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):599-603. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.085. Epub 2007 Dec 3. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 18054000 Clinical Trial.
• Comparison of pregnancy rates for two embryo-transfer catheters.

  Rhodes TL, Higdon HL 3rd, Boone WR. Rhodes TL, et al. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.030. Epub 2006 Nov 13. Fertil Steril. 2007. PMID: 17094973 Clinical Trial.
• Logistic regression analysis of pregnancy rate following transfer of Bos indicus embryos into Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers.

  Peixoto MG, Bergmann JA, Suyama E, Carvalho MR, Penna VM. Peixoto MG, et al. Theriogenology. 2007 Jan 15;67(2):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Sep 15. Theriogenology. 2007. PMID: 16979229