Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Oct;116(5 Suppl):6S-24S.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173862.20563.12.

Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes--tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery

Affiliations

Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes--tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery

P Tessier et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Alloplastic bone substitutes can be used to alter facial contour. In contrast, autogenous bone grafts have a successful 80-year history of restoring facial contour as well as the basic functional support of the craniofacial skeleton. The traditional procedures for harvesting and using autogenous bone grafts are not obsolete. During the past 30 years, the techniques have been refined and new sources have been found, such as calvarial grafts. New tools were required and have been designed to make harvesting of grafts easier and faster for the surgeon and safer and less expensive for the patient. Four short articles under the heading of "Techniques and Tools" are presented addressing the harvesting of (1) iliac, (2) costal, (3) tibial, and (4) calvarial grafts. These articles are based on the experience of six surgeons using the same technique and instruments in more than 20,000 autogenous bone grafting procedures. (These figures represent the group experience as of 2001. Since then, one of the junior coauthors has retired, but the remaining five continue to harvest autogenous bone grafts on a regular basis. So, the group experience as of 2004 is in the range of 23,000 procedures). The-senior surgeon's experience of 9500 procedures spans a period of 50 years (from 1946 to 1996). For the other surgeons (10,500 procedures combined), the collection period was 25 years (from 1975 to 2000).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gosain, A. K., and Persing, J. A.Report on the Symposium “Biomaterials in the Face: Benefits and Risks.” J. Craniofac. Surg. 10: 1, 1999.
    1. Molina, F., and Ortiz-Monasterio, F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 96: 825, 1995.
    1. McCarthy, J. Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
    1. Yonehara, Y.,Secondary lengthening of the reconstructed mandible using a gradual distraction technique: Two case reports. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 51: 356, 1998.
    1. Ollier, L. Reserches experimentales sur les greffes osseuses. J. Physiol. D. 1′Homme et des Animaux 3: 88, 1860.

Substances