Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes--tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery
- PMID: 16217441
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173862.20563.12
Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes--tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery
Abstract
Alloplastic bone substitutes can be used to alter facial contour. In contrast, autogenous bone grafts have a successful 80-year history of restoring facial contour as well as the basic functional support of the craniofacial skeleton. The traditional procedures for harvesting and using autogenous bone grafts are not obsolete. During the past 30 years, the techniques have been refined and new sources have been found, such as calvarial grafts. New tools were required and have been designed to make harvesting of grafts easier and faster for the surgeon and safer and less expensive for the patient. Four short articles under the heading of "Techniques and Tools" are presented addressing the harvesting of (1) iliac, (2) costal, (3) tibial, and (4) calvarial grafts. These articles are based on the experience of six surgeons using the same technique and instruments in more than 20,000 autogenous bone grafting procedures. (These figures represent the group experience as of 2001. Since then, one of the junior coauthors has retired, but the remaining five continue to harvest autogenous bone grafts on a regular basis. So, the group experience as of 2004 is in the range of 23,000 procedures). The-senior surgeon's experience of 9500 procedures spans a period of 50 years (from 1946 to 1996). For the other surgeons (10,500 procedures combined), the collection period was 25 years (from 1975 to 2000).
Similar articles
-
Taking bone grafts from the anterior and posterior ilium--tools and techniques: II. A 6800-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Oct;116(5 Suppl):25S-37S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173951.78715.d7. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005. PMID: 16217442 No abstract available.
-
Taking calvarial grafts, either split in situ or splitting of the parietal bone flap ex vivo--tools and techniques: V. A 9650-case experience in craniofacial and maxillofacial surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Oct;116(5 Suppl):54S-71S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173949.51391.d4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005. PMID: 16217445 No abstract available.
-
Complications of harvesting autogenous bone grafts: a group experience of 20,000 cases.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Oct;116(5 Suppl):72S-73S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173841.59063.7e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005. PMID: 16217446 No abstract available.
-
Bone graft harvesting from regional sites.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;22(3):317-30, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.006. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20713265 Review.
-
Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Oct;63(10):1615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 3. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010. PMID: 19577527 Review.
Cited by
-
Injectable phase-separated tetra-armed poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffold allows sustained release of growth factors to enhance the repair of critical bone defects.Regen Ther. 2023 Nov 25;25:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.11.008. eCollection 2024 Mar. Regen Ther. 2023. PMID: 38108043 Free PMC article.
-
Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):623-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1607-x. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 21630063 Free PMC article.
-
Morphometric analysis of the infratemporal fossa using three-dimensional (3D) digital models.Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Jun;45(6):729-734. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03144-5. Epub 2023 Apr 10. Surg Radiol Anat. 2023. PMID: 37036494
-
Selective laser melted titanium implants: a new technique for the reconstruction of extensive zygomatic complex defects.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan 29;37(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0001-9. eCollection 2015 Dec. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 25654072 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of bone regeneration after maxillary radicular cyst enucleation with or without bone grafting materials: a retrospective cohort study.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 14;28(4):213. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05612-7. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38480533 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gosain, A. K., and Persing, J. A.Report on the Symposium “Biomaterials in the Face: Benefits and Risks.” J. Craniofac. Surg. 10: 1, 1999.
-
- Molina, F., and Ortiz-Monasterio, F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 96: 825, 1995.
-
- McCarthy, J. Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
-
- Yonehara, Y.,Secondary lengthening of the reconstructed mandible using a gradual distraction technique: Two case reports. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 51: 356, 1998.
-
- Ollier, L. Reserches experimentales sur les greffes osseuses. J. Physiol. D. 1′Homme et des Animaux 3: 88, 1860.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous