Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in an adult population
- PMID: 1621751
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90613-g
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in an adult population
Abstract
Loracarbef (LY163892), a member of the class of beta-lactam antibiotics known as carbacephems, is characterized by a high level of chemical stability and a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity that persists in the presence of beta-lactamase. The efficacy and safety of loracarbef, 200 mg (twice daily), and cefaclor, 250 mg (three times daily) (one patient received 178 mg of cefaclor suspension, three times daily), were compared in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted in adults with skin and skin-structure infections due predominantly to Staphylococcus aureus. Examination within 72 hours after the completion of therapy indicated a favorable clinical response in 84 (93.3%) of the 90 loracarbef-treated patients evaluable for efficacy and in 79 (95.2%) of the 83 evaluable patients treated with cefaclor. Pathogens were eradicated in 83 (92.2%) of the patients in the loracarbef group and 74 (89.2%) of those in the cefaclor group. Only four adverse events--headache/migraine, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea--occurred in greater than 2% of the total study population. The overall incidence of adverse events in the 201 loracarbef-treated and 192 cefaclor-treated patients evaluated for safety was 19.9% and 24.5%, respectively. Adverse events that required hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment occurred in four patients in the cefaclor group but in none of those treated with loracarbef. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical or bacteriologic response or the incidence of side effects between the two treatment groups. These findings indicate that loracarbef given twice daily is comparable in safety and efficacy to cefaclor given three times daily in the treatment of adults with skin and skin-structure infections.
Similar articles
-
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor and norfloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated pyelonephritis.Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):86S-94S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90614-h. Am J Med. 1992. PMID: 1621752 Clinical Trial.
-
Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-53. Clin Ther. 1992. PMID: 1576625 Clinical Trial.
-
Loracarbef vs. cefaclor in pediatric skin and skin structure infections.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Aug;11(8 Suppl):S27-30. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199208001-00005. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992. PMID: 1513609 Clinical Trial.
-
Antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections.Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):95S-100S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90615-i. Am J Med. 1992. PMID: 1621753 Review.
-
The safety profile of loracarbef: clinical trials in respiratory, skin, and urinary tract infections.Am J Med. 1992 Jun 22;92(6A):20S-25S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90603-9. Am J Med. 1992. PMID: 1621742 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventions for impetigo.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD003261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003261.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22258953 Free PMC article.
-
Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.Drugs. 1993 May;45(5):716-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345050-00008. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7686466 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical