Do we need USPs?
- PMID: 16217579
Do we need USPs?
Abstract
Australia is lacking the vital data relating to current practices needed to perform a meaningful evaluation of the quality of care in general practice. This article proposes that unannounced standardised patients (USPs) represent a valuable method of measuring actual performance in general practice. Constructive debate about the use of USPs may progress its acceptance as a valid tool for performance assessment and quality improvement.
Comment in
-
Unannounced standardised patients.Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Dec;34(12):998-9. Aust Fam Physician. 2005. PMID: 16374921 No abstract available.
-
Do we need USPs?Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):7. Aust Fam Physician. 2006. PMID: 16502540 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Do we need USPs?Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):7. Aust Fam Physician. 2006. PMID: 16502540 No abstract available.
-
The unannounced standardised patient methodology--a potential feedback tool for registrar training.Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Dec;34 Suppl 1:4-6. Aust Fam Physician. 2005. PMID: 16369671
-
[The APO method--a popular form of quality development in general practice].Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Nov 11;164(46):5390-3. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002. PMID: 12469386 Danish. No abstract available.
-
Using referral letters to measure quality and performance in general practice.J Qual Clin Pract. 1995 Mar;15(1):45-50. J Qual Clin Pract. 1995. PMID: 7757325 Review.
-
[Patients' evaluations as quality measurements in general practice].Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Nov 11;164(46):5386-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002. PMID: 12469385 Review. Danish.