Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice
- PMID: 16219882
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788
Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice
Abstract
Context: The adoption of pay-for-performance mechanisms for quality improvement is growing rapidly. Although there is intense interest in and optimism about pay-for-performance programs, there is little published research on pay-for-performance in health care.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a prototypical physician pay-for-performance program on quality of care.
Design, setting, and participants: We evaluated a natural experiment with pay-for-performance using administrative reports of physician group quality from a large health plan for an intervention group (California physician groups) and a contemporaneous comparison group (Pacific Northwest physician groups). Quality improvement reports were included from October 2001 through April 2004 issued to approximately 300 large physician organizations.
Main outcome measures: Three process measures of clinical quality: cervical cancer screening, mammography, and hemoglobin A1c testing.
Results: Improvements in clinical quality scores were as follows: for cervical cancer screening, 5.3% for California vs 1.7% for Pacific Northwest; for mammography, 1.9% vs 0.2%; and for hemoglobin A1c, 2.1% vs 2.1%. Compared with physician groups in the Pacific Northwest, the California network demonstrated greater quality improvement after the pay-for-performance intervention only in cervical cancer screening (a 3.6% difference in improvement [P = .02]). In total, the plan awarded 3.4 million dollars (27% of the amount set aside) in bonus payments between July 2003 and April 2004, the first year of the program. For all 3 measures, physician groups with baseline performance at or above the performance threshold for receipt of a bonus improved the least but garnered the largest share of the bonus payments.
Conclusion: Paying clinicians to reach a common, fixed performance target may produce little gain in quality for the money spent and will largely reward those with higher performance at baseline.
Comment in
-
Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know.JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1821-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1821. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16219887 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know.JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1821-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1821. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16219887 No abstract available.
-
Experiences of general practices with a participatory pay-for-performance program: a qualitative study in primary care.Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(2):102-6. doi: 10.1071/PY12032. Aust J Prim Health. 2013. PMID: 22954169
-
Putting smart money to work for quality improvement.Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1318-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00414.x. Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 16174136 Free PMC article.
-
Paying for performance in diagnostic imaging: current challenges and future prospects.J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Dec;1(12):952-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.001. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004. PMID: 17411737 Review.
-
Pay-for-performance: what can you expect?J Fam Pract. 2005 Jul;54(7):609-12. J Fam Pract. 2005. PMID: 16009089 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):38-57. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq008. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20386053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pediatric pay-for-performance in asthma: who pays?Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010 Nov;10(6):405-10. doi: 10.1007/s11882-010-0140-0. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010. PMID: 20725813
-
Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):872-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0185-5. Epub 2007 Apr 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17443360 Free PMC article.
-
Does payment for performance increase performance inequalities across health providers? A case study of Tanzania.Health Policy Plan. 2018 Nov 1;33(9):1026-1036. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy084. Health Policy Plan. 2018. PMID: 30380062 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Populations Served in Hospital Service Areas With and Without Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Medical Homes.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182169. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2169. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646177 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous