Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Fall;4(3):189-96.
doi: 10.1187/cbe.05-04-0075.

Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Undergraduate biology courses for nonscientists: toward a lived curriculum

Affiliations

Points of view: content versus process: is this a fair choice? Undergraduate biology courses for nonscientists: toward a lived curriculum

Robin L Wright. Cell Biol Educ. 2005 Fall.

Abstract

Note from the Editors

Cell Biology Education (CBE) is pleased to present “Points of View,” a series designed to address issues faced by many people within the life sciences educational realm. We present several differing points of view back-to-back on a given topic to promote discussion of the topic. Readers are encouraged to participate in the online discussion forum hosted by CBE at http://www.cellbioed.org/discussion/public/main.cfm. We hope op-ed pieces on “Points of View” will stimulate thought and dialogue on significant educational issues.

In this issue, we address the question “What should a biology student know?” Can biologists agree on a core set of content that all biology students should know? What about biology majors versus nonmajors? Can we create a list of facts or skills that every biology student should master? Or should our goals de-emphasize content and concentrate on ability to think, reason, analyze, and communicate? Are the details unimportant as long as students can ask good questions and figure out ways to answer their questions? We present two different “Points of View” that differ in their preferred educational outcomes.

The “Points of View” we present in this issue provide two perspectives that may be familiar ones argued in your department. We invite you to share your ideas, experiences, and insights on the discussion board.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Angelo T.A, Cross K.P. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; (1993)..
    1. Arter J.A, McTighe J. Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom: Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; (2001)..
    1. Boyer E.L. High School: A Report on Secondary Education in America. New York: Harper & Row; (1983)..
    1. Bybee R.W. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; (1997)..
    1. Center for Science Mathematics and Engineering Education. Every Child a Scientist: Achieving Scientific Literacy for All. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; (1998)..

LinkOut - more resources