An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy
- PMID: 16220478
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.2325
An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy
Abstract
Novel therapies are challenging the standards of drug development. Agents with specific biologic targets and limited toxicity require novel designs to determine doses to be taken forward into larger studies. In this paper, we describe an approach that incorporates both toxicity and efficacy data into the estimation of the biologically optimal dose of an agent in a phase I trial. The approach is based on the flexible continuation-ratio model, and uses straightforward optimal dose selection criteria. Dose selection is based on all patients treated up until that time point, using a continual reassessment method approach. Dose-outcome curves considered include monotonically increasing, monotonically decreasing, and unimodal curves. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed design, which we call TriCRM, has favourable operating characteristics.
Similar articles
-
An adaptive phase I design for identifying a biologically optimal dose for dual agent drug combinations.Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2317-30. doi: 10.1002/sim.2707. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17016867
-
Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16(5):623-38. doi: 10.1080/10543400600860394. J Biopharm Stat. 2006. PMID: 17037262
-
Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):777-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x. Biometrics. 2006. PMID: 16984320
-
Phase I studies of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients: a review of the designs.J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16(5):579-604. doi: 10.1080/10543400600860295. J Biopharm Stat. 2006. PMID: 17037260 Review.
-
Statistical designs for early phases of cancer clinical trials.J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1109-26. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.571801. J Biopharm Stat. 2012. PMID: 23075011 Review.
Cited by
-
Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19436029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 14;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-51. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24731155 Free PMC article.
-
A novel Bayesian seamless phase I/II design.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e73060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073060. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24023809 Free PMC article.
-
How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0638-z. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 30658575 Free PMC article.
-
TSNP: A two-stage nonparametric phase I/II clinical trial design for immunotherapy.Pharm Stat. 2021 Mar;20(2):282-296. doi: 10.1002/pst.2075. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Pharm Stat. 2021. PMID: 33025762 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous