Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;81(1):58-65.

Histology and histomorphometry of bone regeneration after experimental injuries

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1622056

Histology and histomorphometry of bone regeneration after experimental injuries

H Göransson et al. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1992.

Abstract

Reparative callus formation upon tubular bone was studied after surgical injuries of different degrees. Thirty-seven young rats were divided into three groups. In the periosteum group the bone was scraped, in the fissure group we made a slit reaching the medulla, and in the defect group a standard defect was sawn. Rats were killed at 6, 12 and 18 days. The formed callus was studied histologically and histomorphometrically. The results suggest than even the primary osteochondrogenic callus formation is dependent on the mode of injury. At six days the three groups differed both qualitatively and quantitatively in regard to callus formation. At 12 and 18 days the total area of woven bone was proportional to the degree of trauma according to the linear regression line Y = 0.883 x X + 0.226 (r = 0.876, P less than 0.001). In the fissure and defect groups reparative bone filled the hole proportionally to the same extent. Periosteal and endosteal woven bone formed round the bone. Medullary bone formation was limited mainly to the area immediately adjacent to the trauma, the result being a cylinder-shaped callus. Cartilage formation was most abundant at six days and was related to the amount of woven bone in the external callus (r = 0.854, P less than 0.001) and to the trauma area (r = 0.707, P less than 0.05).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by