Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?
- PMID: 16221523
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021
Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of gestational age on uterine scar rupture.
Methods: This was a population-based study of data from Cardiff Births Survey over a 10-year (1990-1999) period. Women with only one previous lower segment caesarean section with singleton uncomplicated pregnancy of 37 or more week's gestation, undergoing trial of vaginal delivery were included. SPSS version 10 was used for statistical analysis. Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact test and Chi-square tests were used wherever appropriate. Odds ratio (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) was used to quantify the risk. Potential confounding by other factors was controlled using logistic regression and corrected odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The data was analysed separately for induced and spontaneous labours. Primary outcome measure assessed was uterine scar rupture rate. Secondary outcome measures were repeat caesarean section rates, maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity.
Results: Total sample number was 1620. Eighty percent (n = 1301) of the population went into spontaneous labour and 20% (n = 319) were induced. Successful trial of vaginal birth was accomplished in 60% and trial of scar after estimated date of delivery did not alter this outcome significantly (39.1% versus 43.6%, p > 0.05). We noted an overall scar rupture rate of 0.9% (n = 14) and caesarean section rate of 40.4% (n = 654). Scar rupture rates significantly increased in women who underwent trial of labour after estimated date of delivery (p < 0.001, OR 6.3, CI 1.9-20.2) without a corresponding increase in caesarean section, maternal and perinatal morbidity figures. The influence of gestational age on scar rupture persisted even after controlling for other confounding factors such as birth weight, induction of labour and BMI (corrected OR 1.9, CI 1.1-3.5).
Conclusions: The overall incidence of scar rupture and success of trial of scar after previous caesarean section in our population was similar to that quoted in the literature. Previous evidence has suggested that it is safe for these women to exceed 40 weeks gestation but our data do not support this.
Similar articles
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
-
Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section.BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1394-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15663125
-
[Obstetrical prognosis of patients after a previous caesarean section performed before 32 weeks of amenorrhea].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Nov;44(11):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016. PMID: 27765430 French.
-
Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section.BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):809-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x. Epub 2010 Mar 24. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20236103
-
SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005. PMID: 16001462 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21448. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021448. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32756164 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal characteristics associated with clinical outcomes of TOLAC from 2012-20 in the USA: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 28;54:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101681. eCollection 2022 Dec. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. PMID: 36193170 Free PMC article.
-
Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 21;80:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071. eCollection 2025 Feb. EClinicalMedicine. 2025. PMID: 39902314 Free PMC article.
-
Early-term birth and its association with universal two-child policy: a national cross-sectional study in China.BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 7;11(12):e054959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054959. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34876437 Free PMC article.
-
Trial of labor after previous single cesarean delivery in grand-multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;304(2):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05946-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33389110
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical