Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Oct 22;331(7522):942.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38624.397569.68. Epub 2005 Oct 13.

Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study

Rustam Al-Shahi et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the differences between adults who consent to participate in observational research, and those who do not.

Design: Prospective, population based cohort study.

Setting: Primary and secondary care throughout Scotland.

Participants: 187 adults (aged > or = 16 years) resident in Scotland at the time of their first diagnosis of a brain arteriovenous malformation in 1999-2002.

Intervention: Postal consent form sent via participants' general practitioner.

Main outcome measures: Differences between consenters and non-consenters in demographic and clinical features at first presentation, and outcome during follow-up.

Results: 111 adults (59%) consented to participate in the study. These consenters were not significantly different from non-consenters in age, sex, or socioeconomic status at first presentation. However, consenters were significantly more likely than non-consenters to present alive and independent, and with a seizure. During follow-up, consenters were significantly more likely to receive interventional treatment. Although consenters' survival was significantly better, they were more likely to have a seizure during follow-up. Presentation with intracranial haemorrhage conferred a higher risk of subsequent haemorrhage when the whole cohort was analysed, but not when it was restricted to consenters.

Conclusions: We have found differences between adults who consent to participate in observational records-based research and those who do not, or cannot, consent. Blanket requirements for explicit consent for the use of individuals' identifiable data can bias disease registers, epidemiological studies, and health services research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for death from all causes among 187 adults with brain arteriovenous malformations by their consent to participate in an observational study (consenters 2 deaths, non-consenters 12 deaths; log rank=15.8, P=0.0001)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to first seizure among 187 adults with brain arteriovenous malformations by their consent to participate in an observational study (consenters 42 events, non-consenters 13 events; log rank=4.1, P=0.044)

References

    1. Al-Shahi R, Warlow C. Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit. BMJ 2000;321: 1031-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melton LJ III. The threat to medical-records research. N Engl J Med 1997;337: 1466-70. - PubMed
    1. Protecting patient privacy: striking a balance. Lancet 2001;358: 597. - PubMed
    1. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, et al. Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. N Engl J Med 2004;350: 1414-21. - PubMed
    1. Al-Shahi R, Bhattacharya JJ, Currie DG, Papanastassiou V, Ritchie V, Roberts RC, et al. Scottish intracranial vascular malformation study (SIVMS): evaluation of methods, ICD-10 coding, and potential sources of bias in a prospective, population-based cohort. Stroke 2003;34: 1156-62. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms