Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jan;129(1):143-50.
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20240.

Sex dimorphism in digital formulae of children

Affiliations

Sex dimorphism in digital formulae of children

Matthew H McIntyre et al. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

This paper presents results of a study designed to: 1) test for a sex difference in the relative lengths of the finger bones, including the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D), using left-hand radiographs taken in young children, 2) test whether sex differences can be explained by sex differences in fetal growth, and 3) test the serial stability of sex differences in relative digit lengths, including 2D:4D. Results are presented from 1,060 subjects of the California Child Health and Development Studies. One serial replication at about 9 years old is available from 271 subjects. Results indicate that relative digit lengths are sex-dimorphic in children (Manning et al. [1998] Hum. Reprod. 13:3000-3004, [2004] Early Hum. Dev. 80:161-168). Sex differences in digit length ratios are more pronounced within sibships, where shared family factors are controlled, and are not strongly associated with gross measures of fetal growth, like birth length or weight. Thus, sex differences in the fetal growth of the body are not implicated in sex differences in digital formulae, leaving open the possibility of more direct hormonal and/or genetic causation. However, 2D:4D declined between ages 6-8 in a longitudinal sample, and was a less consistent sex-dimorphic marker than 3D:4D across ethnic groups, suggesting that 3D:4D may be a better marker of perinatal sex differentiation. Prior conflicting findings about 2D:4D may be partly explained by variations in age and ethnicity of populations studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources