A meta-analysis of controlled trials of recombinant human activated protein C therapy in patients with sepsis
- PMID: 16225672
- PMCID: PMC1266358
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-5-7
A meta-analysis of controlled trials of recombinant human activated protein C therapy in patients with sepsis
Abstract
Background: Meta-analysis of two randomised controlled trials in severe sepsis performed with recombinant human activated protein C may provide further insight as to the therapeutic utility of targeting the clotting cascade in this syndrome.
Methods: In search for relevant studies published, two randomized clinical trials were found eligible.
Results: The studies, PROWESS and ADDRESS, enrolled a total of 4329 patients with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) data for effect on 28-day mortality relative to control treatment of 0.92 (0.83-1.02) suggesting that recombinant human activated protein C is not beneficial in severe sepsis. In PROWESS, 873 of 1690 patients presented with low risk, and 2315 of 2639 patients in ADDRESS as defined by APACHE II score < 25. In this low-risk stratum, no effect of recombinant human activated protein C administration on 28-day mortality was observed. This observation appears to be consistent and homogenous. Heterogeneity between the two studies, however, was seen in patients with APACHE II score > or = 25 in whom recombinant activated protein C was effective in PROWESS (n = 817; RR 0.80, CI 0.68-0.94) whereas a tendency toward harm was present in ADDRESS (n = 324; RR 1.21, CI 0.85-1.74). Even though the overall treatment effect in this high-risk population was still in favour of treatment with recombinant activated protein C (n = 1141; RR 0.71, CI 0.59-0.85), the observed heterogeneity suggests that the efficacy of recombinant human activated protein C is not robust. Not unlikely, the adverse tendency observed could have become significant with higher statistical power would ADDRESS not have been terminated prematurely.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis, therefore, raises doubts about the clinical usefulness of recombinant activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis and an APACHE II score > or = 25 which can only be resolved by another properly designed clinical trial.
References
-
- Cohen J, Guyatt G, Bernard GR, Calandra T, Cook D, Elbourne D, Marshall J, Nunn A, Opal S, on behalf of a UK Medical Research Council International Working Party New strategies for clinical trials in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:880–886. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200104000-00039. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wiedermann CJ, Hoffmann JN, Ostermann H, Briegel J, Strauss R, Keinecke H, Jürs M, Kienast J. High-dose antithrombin III in the treatment of severe sepsis with a high risk of death. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:S90. - PubMed
-
- Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, Steingrub JS, Garber GE, Helterbrand JD, Ely EW, Fisher CJ, Jr, Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study group Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources