Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Oct;21(10):1164-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.017.

Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Fabrizio Margheritini et al. Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical success of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction continues to lag behind that of its anterior counterpart. The tibial site of PCL graft fixation has been a focus of recent research. This study examined the effect of combined distal and proximal tibial fixation on the ability of a transtibial PCL reconstruction to restore intact knee kinematics and in situ forces of the intact PCL.

Type of study: Biomechanical study.

Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees were tested. A 134-N posterior tibial load was applied using a robotic/universal force moment sensor testing system at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of knee flexion. Each knee was tested under 4 conditions: intact, PCL-deficient, single-bundle transtibial reconstruction with distal tibial fixation, and single-bundle transtibial reconstruction with combined distal and proximal tibial fixation. Knee kinematics in 5 degrees of freedom for each condition were recorded and in situ forces of the intact PCL and the PCL grafts were determined.

Results: Reconstruction with combined fixation resulted in significantly less posterior tibial translation than reconstruction with distal fixation at 30 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees (P < .05), and restored intact knee kinematics at 90 degrees and 120 degrees (P > .05). Reconstruction with combined fixation more closely restored intact PCL in situ forces at 90 degrees (P < .05).

Conclusions: Transtibial reconstruction with combined fixation more closely restores intact knee kinematics and in situ forces in the PCL at initial fixation than does reconstruction with distal tibial fixation. The improved kinematics and in situ forces seen with the combined fixation may be attributed to decreased functional graft length and increased stiffness of the PCL graft.

Clinical relevance: Combined tibial fixation may provide a more stable reconstruction at initial fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources