Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources
- PMID: 16230312
- PMCID: PMC1283190
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources
Abstract
Objective: To describe where papers come from in a systematic review of complex evidence. Method Audit of how the 495 primary sources for the review were originally identified.
Results: Only 30% of sources were obtained from the protocol defined at the outset of the study (that is, from the database and hand searches). Fifty one per cent were identified by "snowballing" (such as pursuing references of references), and 24% by personal knowledge or personal contacts.
Conclusion: Systematic reviews of complex evidence cannot rely solely on protocol-driven search strategies.
Comment in
-
Protocol-driven search strategies and systematic reviews of complex evidence.Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(1):19. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400383. Evid Based Dent. 2006. PMID: 16557254 No abstract available.
References
-
- Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19: 591-603. - PubMed
-
- Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10: 45-53. - PubMed
-
- Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005;61: 417-30. - PubMed
-
- Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Macfarlane F. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: a systematic literature review. Oxford: Blackwells, 2005.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources